Re: Mercedes still may profit from Chrysler

Lloyd wrote:


>>Of course, but the magazine goobers don't know a good vehicle from their
>>own backside.
> 
> 
> Oh give it a rest.  When the leading auto enthusiast magazine and the
> leading consumer magazine both pan Chrysler products, consider they're
> right and you are blind.

When my direct experience on repeated occasions validates my opinion, I 
don't believe I'm blind.

> 
> Yada, yada, yada.  Grow up.  Your blind, chauvanistic cheerleading for
> Chrysler is tiring and childish.

And your quasi-religious faith in what professional WRITERS (not 
scientists or engineers) repeatedly churn out is abhorrent to me. Even 
they are now being forced by sheer numbers of dissatisfied customers to 
point out that Toyota screws up just as much as anyone else, but they do 
so grudgingly.

Yes, Chrysler has made some engineering screw-ups (I give you the 2.7 
liter v6...), but they're few and far between. Certainly fewer and 
further between than the rag writers would have us believe.