Re: Mercedes still may profit from Chrysler

In article <9s2dnSYCC7PC2R_anZ2dnUVZ_v6rnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Steve wrote:
> Lloyd wrote:
> 
> 
>>>Of course, but the magazine goobers don't know a good vehicle from
their
>>>own backside.
>> 
>> 
>> Oh give it a rest.  When the leading auto enthusiast magazine and the
>> leading consumer magazine both pan Chrysler products, consider they're
>> right and you are blind.
> 
> When my direct experience on repeated occasions validates my opinion, I 
> don't believe I'm blind.
> 
>> 
>> Yada, yada, yada.  Grow up.  Your blind, chauvanistic cheerleading for
>> Chrysler is tiring and childish.
> 
> And your quasi-religious faith in what professional WRITERS (not 
> scientists or engineers) repeatedly churn out is abhorrent to me. Even 
> they are now being forced by sheer numbers of dissatisfied customers to 
> point out that Toyota screws up just as much as anyone else, but they do

> so grudgingly.

This brings back usenet memories.... Parker still wor****ps Consumer 
re****ts and to a lesser extent the car mags... at the same time on other 
subjects will bash people for not citing scientific journals. Of course 
he won't pick up an engineering journal or even read the short verisons 
in SAE's magazine.