Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Car and Auto Forums > Chevrolet - Trucks 4 x 4 > Re: GMC: "We ar...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 46 of 161 Topic 10761 of 11105
Post > Topic >>

Re: GMC: "We are professional grade" <-------- to Commentator

by jack@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jan 20, 2008 at 06:38 PM

jack@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>> It's nice to know that my Chevy truck needed ALL ball joints replaced
>> at $40,000 miles and is considered professional grade.
>>
>> It's nice to know my "Professional Grade" Chevy truck needed a new
>> rear-end at 22,00 miles.
>>
>> It's nice to know my 5 year old "Professional Grade" Chevy truck's
>> check engine light has came on 3 years in a row from November to
>> March and the dealer reads the computer and says its due to a bad
>> thermostat (which has never been changed).
>>

>So your dealer tells you the thermostat is bad and you don't have him
change 
>it?

>That statement alone causes me to question whether the problems you had
were 
>owner caused.

Your response alone causes me to question if you have a brain. So now 
premature wear out of ball joints/shocks and a rear-end are the fault of
not 
changing a thermostadt that a computer mis-re****ts as bad? (which by the
way 
two dealear****ps agreed is a common problem with these "Professional
Grade" 
trucks). 

You sound like an owner of a dealer****p who is always tying to ****ft the 
probem/fault from the automaker/dealer to the owner. 

>Which is not to say you could not have gotten a lemon, but hey, every 
>manufacturer produces a few lemons.


>> It's nice to know my "Professional Grade" Chevy truck's rear shocks
>> were leaking after 10,000 miles. 






--
--------------------------------- --- -- -
Posted with NewsLeecher v3.9 Beta 2
Web @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet
------------------- ----- ---- -- -
 




 161 Posts in Topic:
GMC: "We are professional grade"
"Mr4701" <No  2008-01-19 06:02:06 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
J a c k <baron58@[EMAI  2008-01-19 06:20:24 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
mohawk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-01-18 23:28:42 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"80 Knight" <  2008-01-19 02:56:54 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"Mr4701" <No  2008-01-19 17:57:51 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Mike Dobony <sword@[EM  2008-01-25 23:46:45 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"JR" <Matild  2008-01-26 13:04:38 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Mike Dobony <sword@[EM  2008-01-27 14:54:24 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Old Crow <walliscrow@[  2008-01-26 06:57:29 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"Shawn" <dis  2008-01-28 19:29:00 
Re: "We are professional grade"
mac davis <macsplinter  2008-01-28 19:24:01 
Re: "We are professional grade"
DeserTBoB <desertb@[EM  2008-01-20 02:31:31 
Private Message
   2008-01-19 08:02:02 
Private Message
   2008-01-19 13:24:09 
Private Message
   2008-01-19 20:02:38 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
Jeff <kidsdoc2000@[EMA  2008-01-19 13:32:57 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
clare at snyder.on.ca   2008-01-19 12:35:57 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
"Mr4701" <No  2008-01-19 22:17:40 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
"Edwin Pawlowski&quo  2008-01-20 00:11:23 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
"Mr4701" <No  2008-01-20 00:25:26 
Private Message
   2008-01-19 20:26:10 
Private Message
   2008-01-20 01:34:03 
Private Message
   2008-01-19 18:23:28 
Private Message
   2008-01-20 05:39:45 
Private Message
   2008-01-20 12:55:03 
Private Message
   2008-01-20 15:36:48 
Private Message
   2008-01-20 18:35:30 
Private Message
   2008-01-20 23:45:52 
Private Message
   2008-01-20 18:51:57 
Private Message
   2008-01-20 19:33:39 
Private Message
   2008-01-20 23:24:50 
Private Message
   2008-01-21 07:12:07 
Private Message
   2008-01-21 19:14:08 
Private Message
   2008-01-20 21:32:47 
Private Message
   2008-01-21 07:27:31 
Private Message
   2008-01-21 20:44:43 
Private Message
   2008-01-20 16:38:43 
Private Message
   2008-01-20 21:39:52 
Private Message
   2008-01-20 23:35:37 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
"Edwin Pawlowski&quo  2008-01-20 02:33:50 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
"Mr4701" <No  2008-01-20 02:37:53 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
"Edwin Pawlowski&quo  2008-01-20 04:44:53 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
"Mr4701" <No  2008-01-20 05:21:58 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
jack@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-01-20 15:55:02 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
"Commentator" &  2008-01-20 11:22:17 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade" <-------- to Commentator
jack@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-01-20 18:38:19 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade" <-------- to Commentator
"Commentator" &  2008-01-20 18:41:54 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade" <-------- to Commentator
jack@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-01-21 00:29:45 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade" <-------- to Commentator
"Commentator" &  2008-01-20 23:17:53 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade" <-------- to Commentator
jack@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-01-21 19:05:04 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
"Mr4701" <No  2008-01-20 02:39:32 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
"Mr4701" <No  2008-01-20 05:28:16 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
"Edwin Pawlowski&quo  2008-01-20 06:00:09 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
"Mr4701" <No  2008-01-20 08:03:11 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
"Edwin Pawlowski&quo  2008-01-20 15:02:01 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
clare at snyder.on.ca   2008-01-20 10:11:06 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
Ronald Thompson <ronli  2008-01-20 09:22:14 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
<n5hsr@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-01-20 09:55:42 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
Jeff <kidsdoc2000@[EMA  2008-01-20 16:50:02 
Private Message
   2008-01-19 20:25:20 
Private Message
   2008-01-19 23:17:52 
Private Message
   2008-01-23 02:31:58 
Private Message
   2008-01-24 01:25:53 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
clare at snyder.on.ca   2008-01-19 23:14:06 
Re: "We are professional grade"
nonsense <nonsense@[EM  2008-01-19 07:33:34 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Jeff <kidsdoc2000@[EMA  2008-01-19 13:54:00 
Re: "We are professional grade"
nonsense <nonsense@[EM  2008-01-19 08:28:12 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Jeff <kidsdoc2000@[EMA  2008-01-19 14:46:25 
Re: "We are professional grade"
nonsense <nonsense@[EM  2008-01-19 10:09:22 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Jeff <kidsdoc2000@[EMA  2008-01-19 16:39:36 
Re: "We are professional grade"
clare at snyder.on.ca   2008-01-19 12:33:47 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Jeff <kidsdoc2000@[EMA  2008-01-19 18:25:02 
Re: "We are professional grade"
nonsense <nonsense@[EM  2008-01-19 16:37:38 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Jeff <kidsdoc2000@[EMA  2008-01-20 16:40:55 
Re: "We are professional grade"
nonsense <nonsense@[EM  2008-01-20 11:54:04 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"doug" <NOSP  2008-01-19 18:18:42 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"Whitelightning"  2008-01-19 23:26:09 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"C. E. White" &  2008-01-19 09:56:50 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Jeff <kidsdoc2000@[EMA  2008-01-19 14:59:56 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"JoeSpareBedroom&quo  2008-01-19 15:19:49 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"Topp@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-01-23 08:55:40 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"JoeSpareBedroom&quo  2008-01-23 13:56:32 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Jeff <kidsdoc2000@[EMA  2008-01-23 14:13:13 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"JoeSpareBedroom&quo  2008-01-23 14:15:10 
Re: "We are professional grade"
J a c k <baron58@[EMAI  2008-01-23 12:17:21 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"JoeSpareBedroom&quo  2008-01-23 18:22:56 
Re: "We are professional grade"
J a c k <baron58@[EMAI  2008-01-27 01:12:25 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"JoeSpareBedroom&quo  2008-01-27 02:36:35 
Re: "We are professional grade"
J a c k <baron58@[EMAI  2008-01-28 11:43:31 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"F.H." <conn  2008-01-23 15:21:36 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Jeff <kidsdoc2000@[EMA  2008-01-23 15:52:39 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"JoeSpareBedroom&quo  2008-01-23 15:55:00 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Jeff <kidsdoc2000@[EMA  2008-01-23 16:02:48 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"JoeSpareBedroom&quo  2008-01-23 16:05:55 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Gary L. Burnore <gburn  2008-01-23 16:26:15 
Re: "We are professional grade"
syoung <syoung@[EMAIL   2008-01-23 19:25:25 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"Edwin Pawlowski&quo  2008-01-23 21:38:02 
Re: "We are professional grade"
PerfectReign <theperfe  2008-01-24 08:48:34 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Gary L. Burnore <gburn  2008-01-23 16:24:39 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Gary L. Burnore <gburn  2008-01-23 16:22:40 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"JoeSpareBedroom&quo  2008-01-19 15:22:11 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Jeff <kidsdoc2000@[EMA  2008-01-19 15:33:09 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"JoeSpareBedroom&quo  2008-01-19 15:44:20 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Jeff <kidsdoc2000@[EMA  2008-01-19 16:24:03 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"JoeSpareBedroom&quo  2008-01-19 17:29:10 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Jeff <kidsdoc2000@[EMA  2008-01-19 18:20:59 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"JoeSpareBedroom&quo  2008-01-19 18:41:19 
Re: "We are professional grade"
nonsense <nonsense@[EM  2008-01-19 10:28:52 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Jeff <kidsdoc2000@[EMA  2008-01-19 17:08:39 
Re: "We are professional grade"
nonsense <nonsense@[EM  2008-01-19 16:51:22 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Jeff <kidsdoc2000@[EMA  2008-01-20 16:46:32 
Re: "We are professional grade"
nonsense <nonsense@[EM  2008-01-20 12:06:37 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"none2u" <no  2008-01-21 03:12:51 
Re: "We are professional grade"
nonsense <nonsense@[EM  2008-01-21 07:22:59 
Re: "We are professional grade"
=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku  2008-01-19 20:49:35 
Re: "We are professional grade"
=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku  2008-01-19 20:47:57 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"Mr4701" <No  2008-01-19 22:13:27 
Re: "We are professional grade"
nonsense <nonsense@[EM  2008-01-19 17:03:52 
Private Message
   2008-01-19 20:27:50 
Re: "We are professional grade"
<n5hsr@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-01-19 22:08:55 
Re: "We are professional grade"
<n5hsr@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-01-19 22:01:21 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"Bassplayer12"   2008-01-20 10:53:30 
Re: "We are professional grade"
<n5hsr@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-01-20 09:48:49 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"Ted Mittelstaedt&qu  2008-01-20 12:51:46 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"Topp@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-01-23 09:12:43 
Re: "We are professional grade"
B A R R Y <beech23pilo  2008-01-23 19:25:26 
Re: "We are professional grade"
witfal <nospam@[EMAIL   2008-01-23 12:54:10 
Re: "We are professional grade"
mac davis <macsplinter  2008-01-23 16:24:25 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"Roy" <Roy@[  2008-01-24 10:27:36 
Re: "We are professional grade"
mac davis <macsplinter  2008-01-24 15:49:23 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"Roy" <Roy@[  2008-01-24 20:25:28 
Re: "We are professional grade"
mac davis <macsplinter  2008-01-24 18:44:47 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"Roy" <Roy@[  2008-01-24 22:18:39 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Old Crow <walliscrow@[  2008-01-25 04:20:25 
Re: "We are professional grade"
mac davis <macsplinter  2008-01-25 08:58:49 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"Roy" <Roy@[  2008-01-25 15:55:18 
Re: "We are professional grade"
mac davis <macsplinter  2008-01-25 19:46:55 
Re: "We are professional grade"
<n5hsr@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-01-23 21:51:13 
Re: "We are professional grade"
<n5hsr@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-01-23 20:58:22 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Jeff <kidsdoc2000@[EMA  2008-01-19 13:33:54 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"C. E. White" &  2008-01-19 09:44:16 
Re: "We are professional grade"
=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku  2008-01-19 20:34:14 
Re: "We are professional grade"
=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku  2008-01-20 17:46:30 
Re: "We are professional grade"
<n5hsr@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-01-20 14:27:06 
Re: "We are professional grade"
Hachiroku <Trueno@[EMA  2008-01-21 03:34:23 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"WickeddollŽ" &  2008-01-20 22:47:40 
Re: "We are professional grade"
<n5hsr@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-01-20 23:00:11 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"Mr4701" <No  2008-01-19 22:21:48 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"80 Knight" <  2008-01-19 17:57:19 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"Ed White" <  2008-01-20 12:39:02 
Private Message
   2008-01-20 14:03:39 
Private Message
   2008-01-20 19:24:38 
Private Message
   2008-01-20 13:00:36 
Private Message
   2008-01-20 14:09:10 
Private Message
   2008-01-21 17:14:56 
Private Message
   2008-01-22 12:02:46 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-01-19 17:49:20 
Private Message
   2008-01-19 17:17:34 
Re: "We are professional grade"
"Mr4701" <No  2008-01-19 22:11:25 
Re: "We are professional grade"
clare at snyder.on.ca   2008-01-19 17:26:22 
Re: GMC: "We are professional grade"
PerfectReign <theperfe  2008-01-22 14:20:06 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Dec 2 0:04:26 CST 2008.