Re: FAQ - AKA Frequently ignored answers

On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:57:40 +0000, Catman blather'd thus:

> Dr Entropy wrote:
>> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:27:45 +0000, Catman blather'd thus:
>> 
>>> Zathras wrote:
>>>> Frequently ignored answers - LOL. Your bottle is half empty. You
>>>> should have said 'Occasionally useful answers'.  :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Once upon a time, these answers were useful ;)
>>>
>>> C
>> 
>> You mean they're no longer so?!?!
>> 
>> 
>> ....I'm soooo disillusioned.
>> 
>> My 105 series jumble junkbits will self-destruct in FIVE...
>> 
>> 
>> FOUR....
>> 
>> 
>> Three...
>> 
>> ...two...
>> 
>> NAAHHH.
>> 
>> I'm IGNORING th' half-full bin, rusty as it is.
>> 
>> Please remember: I'm inna "Colonies" here. Stuck without recourse or
>> sup****t.
> 
> Should have thought of that before you threw our tea away :)

So I've been told.

...I guess it's a bit late to offer apology, huh?

-- 
Dr E--
mhm 17x1
SGM #3
smeeter #13
FWAC:"Old No.-7"
Surgeon General-Relativity
Commodore/Upper-Half/1st Virginia Volunteers/CEsium Brigade
NF & TCIB. ATFFFIQ
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 "I don't know what a flonk is, but I know it has something to do with 
children's programming" -- Tampa Stu