Zathras wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:10:03 GMT, Catman
> <catman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> Zathras wrote:
>>> On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:05:07 GMT, Catman
>>> <catman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Fantastic car. Bit primitive by today's standards, but as a driving
>>>> machine,it's the second best I've driven :)
>>> ..after the Triumph?
>>>
>> Nope, you really don't drive bikes.
>
> Bah..a technicality!
No, seriously. It's *very* different IMHO.
>
>> Want to guess again?
>
> Nah..I'm way out of my experience zone. The only time I was in a
> Sprint (a long time ago) I wasn't fit to stand (and neither was the
> driver!). I don't recall ever seeing a 116 let alone knowing how it
> drives. Go on..do tell.. I hope it's not as obvious as the 116..
>
Nope. The Sprint. It's truly lovely to drive. Engine just keeps pulling
and pulling, and the control is just sublime.
116 is OK, but requires rather more persuasion, particularly with that
heavy lump at the front.
--
Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 145 2.0 Cloverleaf 156 V6 2.5 S2
Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see.
www.cuore-s****tivo.co.uk
|
