David A Stocks wrote:
> "SteveH" <steve@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:1id8uvw.1f2hgucwnt9d7N%steve@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> JTDs are much more tolerant of belt changes, but, at 3 years old, I'd
be
>> seriously considering having it done.
>>
>> Is yours a 1.9 or 2.4? - 2.4s are known to last, but they're also a bit
>> tricky to change. Not sure about the 1.9, but they're peanuts to change
>> at an indie.
>> --
> My tame dealer tells me he's never seen a broken belt on a 2.4 JTD. The
> official service interval is 72K, I had mine done at 60K.
>
> D A Stocks
>
>
Is there much evidence of broken belts on the 1.9JTD? And is it still
72,000 for the first change?
|
