Jim wrote:
> David A Stocks wrote:
>> "SteveH" <steve@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:1id8uvw.1f2hgucwnt9d7N%steve@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> JTDs are much more tolerant of belt changes, but, at 3 years old,
>>> I'd be seriously considering having it done.
>>>
>>> Is yours a 1.9 or 2.4? - 2.4s are known to last, but they're also a
>>> bit tricky to change. Not sure about the 1.9, but they're peanuts
>>> to change at an indie.
>>> --
>> My tame dealer tells me he's never seen a broken belt on a 2.4 JTD.
>> The official service interval is 72K, I had mine done at 60K.
>>
>> D A Stocks
>>
>>
> Is there much evidence of broken belts on the 1.9JTD? And is it still
> 72,000 for the first change?
I changed mine at 72K and coming up to 132K just now....
|
