Zathras wrote:
> On Wed, 07 May 2008 17:04:21 GMT, Catman
> <catman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> Zathras wrote:
>>> On Wed, 07 May 2008 08:03:01 GMT, Catman
>>> <catman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Zathras wrote:
>>>>> It's a good point. Even if the undertray looks good, it can be
sagging
>>>>> by a couple of cms toward the middle rear which seems to make an
>>>>> incredible difference to grounding.
>>>>>
>>>> I was on the verge of spending ~£600 when Jamie fixed mine.
>>> Same here - I thought my suspension was on the way out. Main Dealer
>>> hadn't even bothered to put two of the retaining bolts in. Once all
>>> was as the manufacturer intended, the car was *vastly* better.
>>>
>> Still nose heavy, but not worth the cost IMHO.
>
> Quite. However, I'm also 7 years older than when I got it and don't
> feel the need to charge over 'rough ground' as much as I did when I
> was younger!! :-o
>
> The 'fix' is to replace it but the 159TI 2.4 has the following flaws:
>
> Rubbish colours
> No sunroof
> Doesn't look as good
> They've admitted (with their Prodrive collaboration) that they still
> can't do UK-style suspension.
> lardy? *70 hp* more than mine and it's only 1.3s quicker to 60!!
> Very slow seller
Expensive......
--
Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 145 2.0 Cloverleaf 156 V6 2.5 S2
Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see.
www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk
|
