Talk About Network

Google





Car and Auto Forums > BMW > Re: Bimmer auto...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 24 Topic 16617 of 17329
Post > Topic >>

Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?

by "Choam Nomsky" <Choam_Nomsky@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 1, 2008 at 09:09 PM

you again???
sigh.

"kpb" <kennykabuki@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:70415fe0-e922-4d90-bbf6-eee2b8f81be4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>A while back someone posted about the 2000 323i auto transmission
> being junk.  Apparently this is well known.
>
> There was some debate about the 2003-2005 series E46 auto trannies.
>
> Are they also junk?  Or are they OK (as in will they last 200K+ miles
> if they have the fluid changed every 50K or so).
>
> He was under the impression that bimmers were really "bummers".  The
> regulars here became quite infuriated at this comment of his.
>
> Anyway, does anyone know?  Are bimmer trannies still bummers? 



-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 




 24 Posts in Topic:
Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kpb <kennykabuki@[EMAI  2008-02-01 17:39:28 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Choam Nomsky"   2008-02-01 21:09:12 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Pete" <nous  2008-02-01 23:52:43 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
E Brown <three1983s@[E  2008-02-02 08:28:47 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kpb <kennykabuki@[EMAI  2008-02-02 08:48:11 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Choam Nomsky"   2008-02-02 12:36:49 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Dave Plowman (News)  2008-02-02 18:18:53 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
Michael Yeager <myeage  2008-02-02 19:34:00 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Jack" <jack  2008-02-03 01:09:39 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Dave Plowman (News)  2008-02-04 18:59:29 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
E Brown <three1983s@[E  2008-02-03 09:13:19 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-02 16:21:52 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"TPr" <Jnr@[  2008-02-03 10:22:14 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"R. Mark Clayton&quo  2008-02-03 13:03:47 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-03 10:59:12 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"R. Mark Clayton&quo  2008-02-03 17:08:57 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-04 11:31:21 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
admin <admin@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-04 12:20:05 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
Dean Dark <ddrake@[EMA  2008-02-04 12:30:53 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Dave Plowman (News)  2008-02-04 19:07:11 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Dave Plowman (News)  2008-02-04 19:04:23 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-04 14:55:25 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Dave Plowman (News)  2008-02-04 23:47:49 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
admin <admin@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-04 12:14:58 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 20:04:38 PST 2009.