Talk About Network

Google





Car and Auto Forums > BMW > Re: Bimmer auto...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 8 of 24 Topic 16617 of 17329
Post > Topic >>

Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?

by Michael Yeager <myeager@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 2, 2008 at 07:34 PM

On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:18:53 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
<dave@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>In article
><37968036-3353-41b8-a8a8-4e533b2036f4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>   kpb <kennykabuki@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> I asked him a couple questions and questions to the group about the
>> trannie issue.  Some some brilliant poster here (you?, it probably was
>> a worm like you) stated that we (the 'bummer' poster and me) must be
>> the same person since we were both interested in trannie issues.  Nice
>> logic!  I had never mentioned the issue of its 'bummer' trannies until
>> he gave his history with them.
>
>Put a search on Ebay for the transmission in question. See what they
fetch
>secondhand. If the prices are sky high you'll have your answer. In the UK
>there's little demand for secondhand ZF autos so they just fetch what
>you'd expect.

  Well, the ZF 4HP22 in my 89 325i has failed once in the 4 years I
have had it (mind you it's OLD) but the one I took out of it had been
previously remanufactured. Don't know what the previous owners might
have done to it or how well they took care of it but my guess would be
it was neglected like most trannies are. Not too many people actually
change the fluid, most forget to check it. I beat the hell out of it
and wasn't surprised when the torque converter gave out. The rest of
the tranny was fine (it was checked out before I put it back in). I
know that GM had a problem with some of thier trannies and these might
be the ones that found their way to the BMW line. Those problems were
repairable and the repair replaced the weak parts...
 




 24 Posts in Topic:
Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kpb <kennykabuki@[EMAI  2008-02-01 17:39:28 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Choam Nomsky"   2008-02-01 21:09:12 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Pete" <nous  2008-02-01 23:52:43 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
E Brown <three1983s@[E  2008-02-02 08:28:47 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kpb <kennykabuki@[EMAI  2008-02-02 08:48:11 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Choam Nomsky"   2008-02-02 12:36:49 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Dave Plowman (News)  2008-02-02 18:18:53 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
Michael Yeager <myeage  2008-02-02 19:34:00 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Jack" <jack  2008-02-03 01:09:39 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Dave Plowman (News)  2008-02-04 18:59:29 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
E Brown <three1983s@[E  2008-02-03 09:13:19 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-02 16:21:52 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"TPr" <Jnr@[  2008-02-03 10:22:14 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"R. Mark Clayton&quo  2008-02-03 13:03:47 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-03 10:59:12 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"R. Mark Clayton&quo  2008-02-03 17:08:57 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-04 11:31:21 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
admin <admin@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-04 12:20:05 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
Dean Dark <ddrake@[EMA  2008-02-04 12:30:53 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Dave Plowman (News)  2008-02-04 19:07:11 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Dave Plowman (News)  2008-02-04 19:04:23 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-04 14:55:25 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Dave Plowman (News)  2008-02-04 23:47:49 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
admin <admin@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-04 12:14:58 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 20:08:50 PST 2009.