Talk About Network

Google





Car and Auto Forums > BMW > Re: Bimmer auto...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 17 of 24 Topic 16617 of 17329
Post > Topic >>

Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?

by kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Dorsey) Feb 4, 2008 at 11:31 AM

R. Mark Clayton <nospamclayton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>"Scott Dorsey" <kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>news:fo4ocg$qke$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> R. Mark Clayton <nospamclayton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>5 speed steptronic
>>>
>>>The last is comparable with a manual, although I still drive it in
auto, 
>>>but
>>>it is clever and for instance holds gear for a bit after overtaking or
>>>similar.  Even if I didn't have to drive a lot in traffic, I doubt I
would
>>>go back to manual, and as thee next one I get will probably be a
diesel, 
>>>the
>>>6 speed steptronic is almost essential.
>>
>> See, I find the Steptronic very annoying.  I _cannot_ get a smooth
start
>> off the line with the Steptronic or SMG no matter how carefully I do
it.
>> In some ways it feels like it has the worst of both worlds.
>
>Then you have a fault.  No problem with mine.
>
>There were teething problems with early ZF six speeds - look up.

No, I have driven a bunch of the newer ones.  I really wanted to like
it... it seems like a great trade-off, adding electronic complexity to
reduce mechanical complexity.  But it just doesn't feel right to me.
--scott

-- 
"C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
 




 24 Posts in Topic:
Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kpb <kennykabuki@[EMAI  2008-02-01 17:39:28 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Choam Nomsky"   2008-02-01 21:09:12 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Pete" <nous  2008-02-01 23:52:43 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
E Brown <three1983s@[E  2008-02-02 08:28:47 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kpb <kennykabuki@[EMAI  2008-02-02 08:48:11 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Choam Nomsky"   2008-02-02 12:36:49 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Dave Plowman (News)  2008-02-02 18:18:53 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
Michael Yeager <myeage  2008-02-02 19:34:00 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Jack" <jack  2008-02-03 01:09:39 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Dave Plowman (News)  2008-02-04 18:59:29 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
E Brown <three1983s@[E  2008-02-03 09:13:19 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-02 16:21:52 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"TPr" <Jnr@[  2008-02-03 10:22:14 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"R. Mark Clayton&quo  2008-02-03 13:03:47 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-03 10:59:12 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"R. Mark Clayton&quo  2008-02-03 17:08:57 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-04 11:31:21 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
admin <admin@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-04 12:20:05 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
Dean Dark <ddrake@[EMA  2008-02-04 12:30:53 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Dave Plowman (News)  2008-02-04 19:07:11 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Dave Plowman (News)  2008-02-04 19:04:23 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-04 14:55:25 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Dave Plowman (News)  2008-02-04 23:47:49 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
admin <admin@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-04 12:14:58 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 19:19:40 PST 2009.