Talk About Network

Google





Car and Auto Forums > BMW > Re: Bimmer auto...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 21 of 24 Topic 16617 of 17329
Post > Topic >>

Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?

by "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 4, 2008 at 07:04 PM

In article <fo4ocg$qke$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
   Scott Dorsey <kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> R. Mark Clayton <nospamclayton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >5 speed steptronic
> >
> >The last is comparable with a manual, although I still drive it in
> >auto, but it is clever and for instance holds gear for a bit after
> >overtaking or similar.  Even if I didn't have to drive a lot in
> >traffic, I doubt I would go back to manual, and as thee next one I get
> >will probably be a diesel, the 6 speed steptronic is almost essential.

> See, I find the Steptronic very annoying.  I _cannot_ get a smooth start
> off the line with the Steptronic or SMG no matter how carefully I do it.
> In some ways it feels like it has the worst of both worlds. --scott

Eh? Steptronic is a conventional slush pump auto and uses the torque
convertor to start from rest in exactly the same way as any auto -
therefore with as smooth a start. SMG transmissions use a servo operated
dry clutch and at least some can be jerky.

-- 
*They call it PMS because Mad Cow Disease was already taken.  

    Dave Plowman        dave@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
           London SW
                  To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 




 24 Posts in Topic:
Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kpb <kennykabuki@[EMAI  2008-02-01 17:39:28 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Choam Nomsky"   2008-02-01 21:09:12 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Pete" <nous  2008-02-01 23:52:43 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
E Brown <three1983s@[E  2008-02-02 08:28:47 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kpb <kennykabuki@[EMAI  2008-02-02 08:48:11 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Choam Nomsky"   2008-02-02 12:36:49 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Dave Plowman (News)  2008-02-02 18:18:53 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
Michael Yeager <myeage  2008-02-02 19:34:00 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Jack" <jack  2008-02-03 01:09:39 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Dave Plowman (News)  2008-02-04 18:59:29 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
E Brown <three1983s@[E  2008-02-03 09:13:19 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-02 16:21:52 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"TPr" <Jnr@[  2008-02-03 10:22:14 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"R. Mark Clayton&quo  2008-02-03 13:03:47 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-03 10:59:12 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"R. Mark Clayton&quo  2008-02-03 17:08:57 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-04 11:31:21 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
admin <admin@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-04 12:20:05 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
Dean Dark <ddrake@[EMA  2008-02-04 12:30:53 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Dave Plowman (News)  2008-02-04 19:07:11 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Dave Plowman (News)  2008-02-04 19:04:23 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-04 14:55:25 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
"Dave Plowman (News)  2008-02-04 23:47:49 
Re: Bimmer auto trans. still bummers?
admin <admin@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-04 12:14:58 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 20:54:13 PST 2009.