Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Camaro - Firebird > Re: 2000 Camaro...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 10 Topic 3510 of 3549
Post > Topic >>

Re: 2000 Camaro SS user re****t

by "tar~bal" <base@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 1, 2008 at 09:35 AM

"Anthony Fremont" <nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:13uqutn6kdk4fac@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> tar~bal wrote:
>> I bought my car new in 1999.  It now has about 105,000 miles on it
>> and I wanted to see if the issues I've had with it compare to anyone
>> elses:
>> -Transmission shot around 80k (automatic)
>> -Rear end died around 70k
>> -Two water pumps
>> -Driver visor
>> -Small tears in driver seat, none in passenger
>> -Rear window in convertible top leaks (repaired)
>> -3 speaker failures (1 under warranty)
>> -Driver seatbelt, plastic belt retainer broken
>> -Light covers cloudy
>> -Ash tray plastic lid broken
>> -Crack in center convertible boot mysteriously appeared
>> -Worn carpet around accelerator pedal
>>
>> It seems like a lot of stuff, but for 105k?  About right?
>
> For someone that gearheads their car all the time.  Does that sound like

> you?  That's a powerful motor (like you hadn't noticed) and it's
obviously 
> capable of breaking the transmission and rearend.  OTOH, it's not 
> something that occurs from driving your car like an old lady.  I'm 
> guessing you're trying to take another tenth off everyplace you go.

I would run it, but I wasn't abusive.  I'm thinking that the trans and 
rearend should be matched to the engine from the factory.

You killed the water
> pumps from overrevving it; that'd be my best guess.  No complaints about

How could I overrev it?  First, it's an automatic, and I don't ****ft, I
let 
the trans do it.  Second, the computer rev-limits the car anyway.  Again, 
the engine is stock for the most part, the components that failed did so 
because of design in my eyes.


> tire life?  Speakers don't fail like that under normal listening 
> conditions, as in less than jack-hammer volume levels.  Although it's 
> probably tough hearing the radio at 150MPH with the top down.

First the car is speed limited at 130 MPH (I tested it once), and I 
primarily listen to talk radio.  I guess that could be hard on the
speakers, 
too.  But again, shouldn't the speakers be matched to the sound system?

I really don't think that I took my car to any extremes, I just find it
odd 
that it had the problems it did.  A lot of the major issues seem to be in 
engineering and not in the use.
 




 10 Posts in Topic:
2000 Camaro SS user re****t
"tar~bal" <b  2008-03-27 14:20:38 
Re: 2000 Camaro SS user re****t
speedracer7291@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-28 10:44:35 
Re: 2000 Camaro SS user re****t
"Anthony Fremont&quo  2008-03-28 18:13:53 
Re: 2000 Camaro SS user re****t
"tar~bal" <b  2008-04-01 09:35:00 
Re: 2000 Camaro SS user re****t
"jayy68@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-29 22:11:53 
Re: 2000 Camaro SS user re****t
"tar~bal" <b  2008-04-01 09:37:29 
Re: 2000 Camaro SS user re****t
ray <rollingviolation@  2008-04-02 02:34:43 
Re: 2000 Camaro SS user re****t
"jayy68@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-04-02 23:26:04 
Re: 2000 Camaro SS user re****t
"tar~bal" <b  2008-04-03 13:30:03 
Re: 2000 Camaro SS user re****t
"Badda Bing Badda Bo  2008-05-22 15:14:40 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 27 3:24:30 CDT 2008.