<jayy68@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:f2ecafc8-7277-400e-834a-3e0eca1942ef@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mar 27, 11:20 am, "tar~bal" <b...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> I bought my car new in 1999. It now has about 105,000 miles on it and I
> wanted to see if the issues I've had with it compare to anyone elses:
>
> -Transmission shot around 80k (automatic)
> -Rear end died around 70k
> -Two water pumps
> -Driver visor
> -Small tears in driver seat, none in passenger
> -Rear window in convertible top leaks (repaired)
> -3 speaker failures (1 under warranty)
> -Driver seatbelt, plastic belt retainer broken
> -Light covers cloudy
> -Ash tray plastic lid broken
> -Crack in center convertible boot mysteriously appeared
> -Worn carpet around accelerator pedal
>
> It seems like a lot of stuff, but for 105k? About right?
hmm... i guess it is about right... except for the tranny. also,
there are cases where gm does not get the tranny right. like my 86
lesabre.
i've never liked standard speakers... they never are any good for
anything! poor bass and muddled treble.
btw my camaro had 64k miles on it.
what do you think of the 09 camaro? i'm about ready to go for an 2010
prodn year. (=
===
Looks good, as does the Challenger that will beat it to the market. The
Challenger is debuting at about 40K, which is a little steep for a car
that's getting 13mpg (I know, it shouldn't be a factor, but gas is
expensive). As far as I know, there's no MSRP on the Camaro yet, but I'm
thinking the SS will likely be right about there as well. I think I'll
hold
out for the rag top of either car. (wishful thinking)
|
