On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 07:57:24 -0700, Heather & Joe Way
<sierrasa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 18:24:10 -0700, Heather & Joe Way
><joe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 19:50:09 -0400, PeterD <peter2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I'd say it is worth between 40 and 40,000 dollars. Take the average of
>>>20,020 and offer him that.
>>>
>>>Or go buy one that is more visually appealing to you, and offer to
>>>trade him even.
>>================================
>>Your math is just about at par with your understanding of what Zip is
>>trying to do.
>>
>>Joe
>===============================
>Note to self:
>
>Even with your new monitor, you still need your gl***** to read.
>
>The math is OK, but the logic is still way off.
>
>Joe
<g> What the OP is doing is either trolling or being really dumb...
How can someone come up with a value for so vague an item?
As to the OP's 'justification', that is just icing on the cake--a good
laugh, but not much more.
Here it is:
An item's value is solely what a buyer will pay for it if the seller
wants to sell it. Nothing more, nothing less.
So, the OP should contact the owner, and say "how much". Then the OP
can decide: "Do I really want this?" If the answer is yes, then he
should buy it. If not he should simply get on with his life and worry
less about what his neighbors do, own or drive.
|
