On Apr 23, 8:31 am, PeterD <pet...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 07:57:24 -0700, Heather & Joe Way
>
>
>
> <sierr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 18:24:10 -0700, Heather & Joe Way
> ><j...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 19:50:09 -0400, PeterD <pet...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>>I'd say it is worth between 40 and 40,000 dollars. Take the average
of
> >>>20,020 and offer him that.
>
> >>>Or go buy one that is more visually appealing to you, and offer to
> >>>trade him even.
> >>================================
> >>Your math is just about at par with your understanding of what Zip is
> >>trying to do.
>
> >>Joe
> >===============================
> >Note to self:
>
> >Even with your new monitor, you still need your gl***** to read.
>
> >The math is OK, but the logic is still way off.
>
> >Joe
>
> <g> What the OP is doing is either trolling or being really dumb...
> How can someone come up with a value for so vague an item?
Beats me. BlueBook and Edmunds manage to do it - are their users
"really dumb"? I was just asking this group to fill in a hole those
sources don't cover. I'm pleased and honored you took it as an
invitation to bestow your advice on how to deal with people and local
ordinances - but it really wasn't what I was looking for. However,
I'll keep you in mind when I am in search of such wisdom.
>
> As to the OP's 'justification', that is just icing on the cake--a good
> laugh, but not much more.
If I brought some humor to your life, my existence has been
worthwhile.
Zip
|
