Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Corvette > Re: WTC Towers:...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 7 Topic 7226 of 7766
Post > Topic >>

Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition

by van Dark <van.dark@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 8, 2007 at 01:47 PM

Doctor Evil napsal(a):
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 13:57:17 -0600, Ric Seyler <ricseyler@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> 
>> schoenfeld.one@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>
>>> WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
>>> By Herman Schoenfeld
>>>
>>> In this article we show that "top-down" controlled demolition
>>> accurately accounts for the collapse times of the World Trade Center
>>> towers. A top-down controlled demolition can be simply characterized
>>> as a "pancake collapse" of a building missing its sup****t columns.
>>> This demolition profile requires that the sup****t columns holding a
>>> floor be destroyed just before that floor is collided with by the
>>> upper falling m*****. The net effect is a pancake-style collapse at
>>> near free fall speed.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>> You actually think that the Inept Bush Admin could pull off something 
>> like that
>> and not screw it all up?? Pulllllease.......... no frikkin way.
> 
> The only reason Bush was appointed President by the Supreme Court was
> to have a ****ing moron to laugh at while Cheney sharpened his knives
> to destroy America in secret.  It's simple distraction.
> 
> 
> O'ROURKE: I mean, this is lots of fun attacking George Bush, who is an
> idiot and obviously screwed up on this completely
> BEHAR: Thank you! 
> MAHER: Oh, thank you! 
> 
> PJ O'Rourke on Bill Maher show 9/16/2005
Okay, Bush is a great idiot, I agree, of course. WTC is his "work".
 




 7 Posts in Topic:
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Ric Seyler <ricseyler@  2007-12-07 13:57:17 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Doctor Evil <Evil@[EMA  2007-12-07 15:31:12 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Ric Seyler <ricseyler@  2007-12-07 15:39:40 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
"Mr. Strat" <  2007-12-07 14:26:10 
Re: (OT) : How Long Do We Have To Re-Hash This Shit ? -btyb- Mov
Doctor Evil <Evil@[EMA  2007-12-11 02:48:27 
Re: (OT) : How Long Do We Have To Re-Hash This Shit ? -btyb- Mov
"Dennis M. Hammes&qu  2007-12-12 03:17:49 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
van Dark <van.dark@[EM  2007-12-08 13:47:41 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Oct 11 14:46:51 CDT 2008.