Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew

On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:43:50 -0600, "'Key" <Key@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
something wonderfully witty:

>"The Wolf With the Red Roses" <after-dark-arms@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>wrote in message 
>news:vsk9m39vtsher4rbfecdiu00h0k0opq4rg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:05:34 -0600, "'Key" <Key@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>> wrote
>> something wonderfully witty:
>>
>>>"Andrew DeFaria" <Andrew@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>news:4761f13a$0$10303$815e3792@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> 'Key wrote:
>>>>> "Andrew DeFaria" <Andrew@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>> ---snip---
>>>>>
>>>>> there is really no need for your bad-language on this
>>>>> group. respect
>>>>> this group or take a hike..
>>>>>
>>>>> my2¢
>>>> Ah, respectfully, no sir. I haven't let people try to
>>>> control my usage
>>>> of language since, well, since I turned 18. I'm not 
>>>> about
>>>> to start now.
>>>> When people act like idiots they deserve such language.
>>>> You're free to
>>>> disagree with that if you like but I'm also free to 
>>>> agree
>>>> with it! If
>>>> you don't like that well then I will _suggest_ that *you
>>>> *take a hike -
>>>> or not - your choice.
>>>
>>>Well, your're WRONG about that Andrew.
>>>There are women that frequent this group and you
>>>SHOULD act like a man instead of a troll and respect them.
>>>
>> While I do agree with what you say, what about all this 
>> "Diversity" &
>> "Equality" crap.  If it is right for others, then it is 
>> supposed to be
>> right for a woman.  However, when wrong, then wrong for 
>> everyone
>> regardless of gender.
>
>doesn't apply to my comment to Andrew...
>didn't say it was right for anyone, woman or man...
>
Well I do believe you said "There are women that frequent this group
and you SHOULD act like a man instead of a troll and respect them."  

This then thereby infers that his behavior is acceptable to you if it
were "not" for the women who might frequent the forum and only
unacceptable because there are women who may frequent here.

While I realize that this maybe a some what salient point most have a
hard time grasping, or quite possibly even semantics, there is a point
to be made.  If women want all their "rights" & "equalities" that they
are constantly nattering on about, especially in the workplace -- then
there can only be one standard of behavior that does not take their
gender into consideration.  Again, good for the Goose, good for the
Gander.

Now if you had simply said his behavior was unacceptable without any
qualifiers to gender or the ever infamous kiddie factor, I would have
both 100% agreed & not brought up this point.

It is all part of the great neutering of America dontcha know!


-- 

If life is a waste of time,
and time is a waste of life,
then let's all get wasted together
and have the time of our lives.