Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew

"The Wolf With the Red Roses" <after-dark-arms@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
wrote in message 
news:stbbm39rs8fh449e9d8ac0bho3tbe789ho@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:43:50 -0600, "'Key" <Key@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> wrote
> something wonderfully witty:
>
>>"The Wolf With the Red Roses" <after-dark-arms@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>wrote in message
>>news:vsk9m39vtsher4rbfecdiu00h0k0opq4rg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:05:34 -0600, "'Key" <Key@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote
>>> something wonderfully witty:
>>>
>>>>"Andrew DeFaria" <Andrew@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>news:4761f13a$0$10303$815e3792@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> 'Key wrote:
>>>>>> "Andrew DeFaria" <Andrew@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in 
>>>>>> message
>>>>>> ---snip---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> there is really no need for your bad-language on this
>>>>>> group. respect
>>>>>> this group or take a hike..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> my2¢
>>>>> Ah, respectfully, no sir. I haven't let people try to
>>>>> control my usage
>>>>> of language since, well, since I turned 18. I'm not
>>>>> about
>>>>> to start now.
>>>>> When people act like idiots they deserve such 
>>>>> language.
>>>>> You're free to
>>>>> disagree with that if you like but I'm also free to
>>>>> agree
>>>>> with it! If
>>>>> you don't like that well then I will _suggest_ that 
>>>>> *you
>>>>> *take a hike -
>>>>> or not - your choice.
>>>>
>>>>Well, your're WRONG about that Andrew.
>>>>There are women that frequent this group and you
>>>>SHOULD act like a man instead of a troll and respect 
>>>>them.
>>>>
>>> While I do agree with what you say, what about all this
>>> "Diversity" &
>>> "Equality" crap.  If it is right for others, then it is
>>> supposed to be
>>> right for a woman.  However, when wrong, then wrong for
>>> everyone
>>> regardless of gender.
>>
>>doesn't apply to my comment to Andrew...
>>didn't say it was right for anyone, woman or man...
>>
> Well I do believe you said "There are women that frequent 
> this group
> and you SHOULD act like a man instead of a troll and 
> respect them."

yep, sure did.

> This then thereby infers that his behavior is acceptable 
> to you if it
> were "not" for the women who might frequent the forum and 
> only
> unacceptable because there are women who may frequent 
> here.

no, I believe I knew what I meant.
it was said that way so he may understand that this group in 
general does-not except that type of language, period...

> While I realize that this maybe a some what salient point 
> most have a
> hard time grasping, or quite possibly even semantics, 
> there is a point
> to be made.  If women want all their "rights" & 
> "equalities" that they
> are constantly nattering on about, especially in the 
> workplace -- then
> there can only be one standard of behavior that does not 
> take their
> gender into consideration.  Again, good for the Goose, 
> good for the
> Gander.

well, I believe you are putting more into this then was 
entended.
I am from the old school where we respected women just 
because they are women.

> Now if you had simply said his behavior was unacceptable 
> without any
> qualifiers to gender or the ever infamous kiddie factor, I 
> would have
> both 100% agreed & not brought up this point.

glad you brought that up.
I should have also mentioned the "kiddie factor"....
how you interoperate all this is up to you...

g'day to ya
--
'Key