Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Corvette > Re: GPS Nav in ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 81 of 99 Topic 7217 of 7695
 Post > Topic >>

Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew

by Andrew DeFaria <Andrew@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 22, 2007 at 05:06 PM

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------020009000103000600040501
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The Wolf With the Red Roses wrote:
>> No it's my opinion. Girls tend to want to be like their mothers, not 
>> their fathers as boys tend to want to be like their fathers, not 
>> their mothers. You can't seriously say you haven't noticed such a
trend!
> While you're opinion it has been disproved in valid peer-reviewed 
> scientific studies.
Like... References please...
> Under your theory if a female child's mother is dead, they themselves 
> would aspire to be expired.
Yet another non sequitur. I said "girls *tend* to want to be like their 
mothers". Where and when did that turn into "girls *must* be like their 
mothers..."? Perhaps one of those nameless peer-reviewed scientific 
studies... Here's the shortcut - "tend" does not mean "always". 
Therefore it does follow that in cases where a female child's mother is 
dead one (who has 1/2 a brain) might conclude that said child would 
probably not aspire to be expired... Geeze...
>>> Most when refer to Role-Models are talking about values & actions to 
>>> be admired & emulated. These are not gender specific things.
>> How touchy and feely...
> Not really, in case you haven't been out & about much lately, today's 
> world has become very gender non-specific in a lot of things. I'm 
> quite sure your aware of things like single fathers who raise 
> non-butch daughters aren't you?
Methinks you still need to hit the books WRT the difference between 
"tend" and "always"... Again, here's a clue: tend means like most of the 
time. Indeed single fathers raising daughters are the exception to the 
rule in the first place. Yes I get out and I happen to know that single 
fathers with custody of their kids is indeed rare, not the rule. Tend 
deals with what is common, what is in the majority, what happens most of 
the time. It is not in the realm of the exceptions, what happens rarely 
or in few of the cases. The very term "single father" is, by definition 
and by statistics, rare. So it sounds to me that it is you, not me, who 
hasn't been out in today's world lately.

Meantime I'll sit back and wait for those scientific studies you alluded 
too...
-- 
Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com>
Cannot find REALITY.SYS. Universe halted.

--------------020009000103000600040501
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  <title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
The Wolf With the Red Roses wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:v16rm3lvk5fqp5ml6t76s7s8loiih5ektk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
 type="cite">
  <blockquote type="cite">No it's my opinion. Girls tend to want to be
like their mothers, not their fathers as boys tend to want to be like
their fathers, not their mothers. You can't seriously say you haven't
noticed such a trend!<br>
  </blockquote>
<!---->While you're opinion it has been disproved in valid
peer-reviewed scientific studies.</blockquote>
Like... References please...<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:v16rm3lvk5fqp5ml6t76s7s8loiih5ektk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
 type="cite"> Under your theory if a female child's mother is dead,
they themselves would aspire to be expired.<br>
</blockquote>
Yet another non sequitur. I said "girls <b>tend</b> to want to be like
their mothers". Where and when did that turn into "girls <b>must</b>
be like their mothers..."? Perhaps one of those nameless peer-reviewed
scientific studies... Here's the shortcut - "tend" does not mean
"always". Therefore it does follow that in cases where a female child's
mother is dead one (who has 1/2 a brain) might conclude that said child
would probably not aspire to be expired... Geeze...<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:v16rm3lvk5fqp5ml6t76s7s8loiih5ektk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
 type="cite">
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <blockquote type="cite">Most when refer to Role-Models are talking
about values &amp; actions to be admired &amp; emulated. These are not
gender specific things.<br>
    </blockquote>
How touchy and feely...<br>
  </blockquote>
<!---->Not really, in case you haven't been out &amp; about much
lately, today's world has become very gender non-specific in a lot of
things. I'm quite sure your aware of things like single fathers who
raise non-butch daughters aren't you?<br>
</blockquote>
Methinks you still need to hit the books WRT the difference between
"tend" and "always"... Again, here's a clue: tend means like most of
the time. Indeed single fathers raising daughters are the exception to
the rule in the first place. Yes I get out and I happen to know that
single fathers with custody of their kids is indeed rare, not the rule.
Tend deals with what is common, what is in the majority, what happens
most of the time. It is not in the realm of the exceptions, what
happens rarely or in few of the cases. The very term "single father"
is, by definition and by statistics, rare. So it sounds to me that it
is you, not me, who hasn't been out in today's world lately.<br>
<br>
Meantime I'll sit back and wait for those scientific studies you
alluded too...<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<a href="http://defaria.com">Andrew
DeFaria</a><br>
<small><font color="#999999">Cannot find REALITY.SYS. Universe
halted.</font></small>
</div>
</body>
</html>

--------------020009000103000600040501--




 99 Posts in Topic:
GPS Nav in 2008
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-02 18:40:51 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 John Smith <user@[EMAI  2007-12-03 09:16:54 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-03 08:41:01 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 "My Name Is Nobody&q  2007-12-03 15:56:04 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-03 09:24:10 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 Bob G. <rg327_remove_c  2007-12-03 11:41:38 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 "MikeSo" <mi  2007-12-03 10:25:34 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-03 22:52:16 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 Ric Seyler <ricseyler@  2007-12-03 12:26:45 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 observer   2007-12-05 06:19:21 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-05 07:57:37 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 observer   2007-12-08 05:32:06 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-08 11:04:18 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 observer   2007-12-09 23:44:05 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-10 07:36:01 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 "My Name Is Nobody&q  2007-12-11 09:26:51 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-11 08:07:58 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 "My Name Is Nobody&q  2007-12-13 00:57:08 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-12 21:50:51 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 "My Name Is Nobody&q  2007-12-13 18:32:35 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-13 19:57:17 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 "'Key" <Key@  2007-12-13 17:22:02 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-13 19:58:02 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 "'Key" <Key@  2007-12-13 22:05:34 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-13 21:44:57 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 observer   2007-12-13 22:45:03 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-13 19:29:30 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 "CardsFan" <  2007-12-14 10:12:30 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 observer   2007-12-14 11:02:18 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 "'Key" <Key@  2007-12-14 13:26:02 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 "CardsFan" <  2007-12-15 05:16:57 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 The Wolf With the Red Ros  2007-12-16 02:30:33 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 "'Key" <Key@  2007-12-16 14:43:50 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 The Wolf With the Red Ros  2007-12-16 18:17:23 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 "'Key" <Key@  2007-12-17 10:37:25 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Clueless   2007-12-17 11:04:06 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 The Wolf With the Red Ros  2007-12-21 18:25:12 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 "My Name Is Nobody&q  2007-12-22 01:14:46 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 The Wolf With the Red Ros  2007-12-22 18:05:29 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 observer   2007-12-11 06:00:22 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-11 08:08:33 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <adefar  2007-12-17 16:19:55 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 observer   2007-12-17 23:25:16 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-18 01:13:48 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 "My Name Is Nobody&q  2007-12-18 22:11:15 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-18 20:37:19 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 "My Name Is Nobody&q  2007-12-19 07:25:56 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-19 00:33:57 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 "My Name Is Nobody&q  2007-12-19 08:41:52 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-19 08:01:58 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2007-12-19 17:01:53 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 "'Key" <Key@  2007-12-19 12:30:03 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-19 21:11:02 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 The Wolf With the Red Ros  2007-12-21 18:14:38 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-21 22:19:01 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 "MikeSo" <mi  2007-12-22 14:28:26 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-22 16:46:24 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 "MikeSo" <mi  2007-12-22 21:02:37 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-22 22:25:41 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 "MikeSo" <mi  2007-12-22 21:40:01 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-23 08:58:34 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2007-12-18 12:55:03 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-18 20:34:53 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2007-12-19 01:27:03 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-18 23:39:26 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 observer   2007-12-19 10:05:25 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 "'Key" <Key@  2007-12-19 12:34:35 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2007-12-19 16:49:52 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-19 21:13:24 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-19 21:10:27 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 observer   2007-12-20 13:57:20 
attn: Andrew
 "'Key" <Key@  2007-12-20 14:16:36 
Re: attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-20 20:07:33 
Re: attn: Andrew
 aBigblockVette@[EMAIL PRO  2007-12-31 09:23:30 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-20 20:06:43 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 The Wolf With the Red Ros  2007-12-21 18:20:53 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-21 22:22:04 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 "MikeSo" <mi  2007-12-22 14:33:33 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-22 16:56:31 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 The Wolf With the Red Ros  2007-12-22 18:08:50 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-22 17:06:51 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 The Wolf With the Red Ros  2007-12-21 18:17:45 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Sarah Czepiel <ninety7  2007-12-22 12:11:00 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 "MikeSo" <mi  2007-12-18 08:35:33 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-18 20:35:21 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 The Wolf With the Red Ros  2007-12-21 18:27:08 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 "MikeSo" <mi  2007-12-22 14:35:32 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew / adefaria@gmail.com
 "'Key" <Key@  2007-12-18 22:44:59 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew / adefaria@gmail.com
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-18 23:07:38 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 The Wolf With the Red Ros  2007-12-21 18:12:09 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-21 22:15:39 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 The Wolf With the Red Ros  2007-12-22 18:04:36 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008 / attn: Andrew
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-22 16:58:23 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 "fh" <castus  2007-12-04 00:05:50 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 Dale <me@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-12-04 14:17:32 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 "Bill Gander" &  2007-12-04 07:13:25 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 Andrew DeFaria <Andrew  2007-12-04 09:17:58 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 Andrew DeFaria <adefar  2007-12-04 15:52:41 
Re: GPS Nav in 2008
 Dale <me@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-12-05 12:19:37 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
Contact
tan12V112 Fri Sep 5 21:26:19 CDT 2008.