Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Corvette > Re: WTC Towers:...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 10 Topic 7328 of 7766
 Post > Topic >>

Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition

by Assy Nipples <Nips@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 2, 2008 at 07:43 PM

On 2008-04-02 09:31:56 -0400, schoenfeld.one@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 said:

> In this article we show that "top-down" controlled demolition
> accurately accounts for the collapse times of the World Trade Center
> towers.


Nonsense. Now go away ****wit.




 10 Posts in Topic:
WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
 schoenfeld.one@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-02 06:31:56 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
 adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-02 09:40:35 
Re: ( OT ) Rubbish !
 barnegatdx <barnegatdx  2008-04-02 08:04:35 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
 Venger <venger@[EMAIL   2008-04-02 16:04:31 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
 Assy Nipples <Nips@[EM  2008-04-02 19:43:00 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
 "Parnello's Pizza&qu  2008-04-03 00:21:30 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
 Assy Nipples <Nips@[EM  2008-04-03 18:54:17 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
 "Mr. Strat" <  2008-04-04 05:22:45 
An open letter to all the f*ckwits. :-p
 warp-9.9@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-07 18:50:28 
Re: An open letter to all the f*ckwits. :-p
 Venger <venger@[EMAIL   2008-04-11 08:31:25 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
Contact
tan12V112 Sun Oct 12 3:33:36 CDT 2008.