On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 14:35:19 -0500, BDK <BDK@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>In article <mm1un3tfvb5d802jbatnc5nkbnpdbeap06@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, clare at
>snyder.on.ca says...
>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:06:42 -0500, "bencovaci"
>> <benjamincovaci@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> >is the 2003 dodge intrepid se 2.7L an interference engine?
>>
>>
>> Mabee the first question is does it qualify as an engine?
>>
>>
>
>I'll give it a half engine. That's what my neighbor's car feels like it
>has in it when I drive it. They had no choice on it though, it was
>bought by the place he works at. Free car, how can he complain?
>
>BDK
Hope he's keeping the oil changed - oftener than most pundits would
consider "necessary".
That engine has severe sludge problems if maintained according to the
"normal" schedule - and it is VERY unforgiving.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
