On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:57:16 -0500, clare at snyder.on.ca, in an
obviously impaired state, wrote:
>On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 14:35:19 -0500, BDK <BDK@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>In article <mm1un3tfvb5d802jbatnc5nkbnpdbeap06@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, clare at
>>snyder.on.ca says...
>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:06:42 -0500, "bencovaci"
>>> <benjamincovaci@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>> >is the 2003 dodge intrepid se 2.7L an interference engine?
>>>
>>>
>>> Mabee the first question is does it qualify as an engine?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I'll give it a half engine. That's what my neighbor's car feels like it
>>has in it when I drive it. They had no choice on it though, it was
>>bought by the place he works at. Free car, how can he complain?
>>
>>BDK
>Hope he's keeping the oil changed - oftener than most pundits would
>consider "necessary".
>That engine has severe sludge problems if maintained according to the
>"normal" schedule - and it is VERY unforgiving.
Use of synthetic oils in that engine family has been shown to reduce
the occurrance of seizure due to oil starvation.
--
Ray Sirois
SysOp: The Lost Chord BBS
http://thelostchord.dns2go.com:6080
telnet://thelostchord.dns2go.com:6023
|
