I don't know why you would think a 2003 2.7 wouldn't be running. Unless you
don't read here, regularly.
Larry
"Raymond Sirois" <nomail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:0g06o3d891bnge6ukj9d92kcqckqfaia6j@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 23:26:38 -0500, clare at snyder.on.ca, in an
: obviously impaired state, wrote:
:
: >On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:06:42 -0500, "bencovaci"
: ><benjamincovaci@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
: >
: >>is the 2003 dodge intrepid se 2.7L an interference engine?
: >
: >
: >Mabee the first question is does it qualify as an engine?
:
: I'm wondering how a 2003 2.7l engine is still running. Must have been
: garaged for the last three years...
: --
: Ray Sirois
: SysOp: The Lost Chord BBS
: http://thelostchord.dns2go.com:6080
: telnet://thelostchord.dns2go.com:6023
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
