Got an idea... No doubt there are some who enjoy reading about your
ventures, and there are some who do not.
Rather than saturate virtually every Usergroup with your wailing, why not
set up a MI.5 Usergroup all on it's own. They your followers can focus on
your material and those with limited interest do not have to see it
everywhere we go.
I'm convinced the UK Government is after you, but there is NOTHING I can
do
about is, so please give us a break, OK ?
DCD
<evmefmv@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:ro0800011545298586@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> -= my response. to the harassment -=
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> My first reaction in 1990/91 was to assume that if I. broke contact then
> they. would not be able to follow and would lose interest. So I did the
> things that have been suggested by other. people; I sold my television,
> stopped listening to the radio. and tried to withdraw away from the
sources
> of. abuse as much as possible. I reasoned that they must have more
im****tant
> things to deal with and that normal people would simply leave me. alone
if
> it. were made difficult for them to continue their harassment.
>
> I reckoned without the sheer vindictiveness. of the abusers. They did
not
> let up but instead "got to" people around me, mainly people at work, to.
do
> their dirty work for them. I went to see my GP, who refused to believe.
what
> he was being told, and refused to direct me. on to anyone who could be
of
> practical assistance. It was not. until three years had passed that the
GP
> admitted the matter. was outside his competence and suggested going to
the
> police.
>
> In. the summer of 1994 we called in counter-surveillance experts from a
> private detective agency to sweep our. house and telephone for bugging
> devices. They conducted a thorough search and found nothing; but as.
noted
> above, since the existence of surveillance. was being forced in my face
by
> the harassers, you would expect them to. have taken the possibility of a
> counter-surveillance sweep into account when planning. the type of
devices
> to. be employed.
>
> In Easter 1995 I made a complaint to my local Police station. in London,
but
> the police have not expressed any intention to do anything about. the
> continuing harassment ("we're not. saying it's happening and we're not
> saying it isn't happening" were. the words used). I think the officer I
> spoke to at Easter wasn't aware. of it happening, although other members
of
> the police force. obviously do know.
>
> From. April 1995 until the present time the matter has been discussed in
a
> lot of detail on the Usenet (Internet) "uk.misc" newsgroup.. That
discussion
> has given birth to the article which you are. now reading. My hopes in
> posting to Usenet were that wider publicizing would discourage. the
security
> services. from continuing their harassment, and "draw people out" into
> concurring with the truth of what was being said.. Neither of those have
> followed, but the discussion has served a purpose in allowing. this
> structured re****t to. be created.
>
> 8311
>
|
