Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Ford Focus > Re: Fuel econom...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 12 of 12 Topic 3040 of 3089
Post > Topic >>

Re: Fuel economy

by Chris Whelan <cawhelan@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 11, 2008 at 06:04 PM

Springy wrote:

> Springy wrote:
>> I've just bought my first Focus, I'm very happy with it apart from the
>> fuel consumption. It's a 1.6 Zetec Climate, I don't drive it hard but I
>> only get 28mpg around town. For a modern engine this is rubbish - my
son
>> has a 1.6 Peogeot diesel 206, he gets 45 mpg on the same sort of run. I
>> obviously expected some difference, but not this much!
>> 
>> Is 28 mpg around town/45mpg motorway normal for this car?
>> 
>> Neil.
> 
> Thanks for all the responses guys and gals, looks as though my focus is
> normal then. Not wanting to look a complete idiot, I wasn't comparing my
> focus with a small diesel, of course I know that there will be some
> difference but I didn't expect the diesel to consume *half* as much fuel
> as my car - 

28 isn't even near to half of 45...

The Focus and the 206 are not in the same market sector. You need to
compare
eggs with eggs.

> I thought modern engines were supposed to be efficient! 

Modern engines *are* more efficient than older ones.

Fuel consumption is not so good due to all the emission control systems
fitted, and the added weight of safety systems, and extras like air-con
and
power steering.

Even if you go back one generation and compare the weight of an Escort
with
that of a Focus, there is  a significant difference. Compare the Focus
with
something from the '60s like a Ford Anglia and the difference is
suprising.

Increased weight will have more effect on consumption in the urban cycle
than the constant speed figures.

> Depending on the trade-in I may change to a diesel sooner rather than
> later.

Bear in mind that some operating costs can be higher for diesels, and not
everyone likes the driving characteristics of them - me for one!

Chris

-- 
Remove prejudice to reply.
 




 12 Posts in Topic:
Fuel economy
Springy <Idonot.wanto@  2008-04-10 18:04:02 
Re: Fuel economy
Chris Whelan <cawhelan  2008-04-10 18:17:14 
Re: Fuel economy
Paul Giverin <paul@[EM  2008-04-10 20:38:49 
Re: Fuel economy
"Don McC" <D  2008-04-10 18:37:00 
Re: Fuel economy
Blinky the Shark <no.s  2008-04-11 22:51:11 
Re: Fuel economy
Alan <junk_reply@[EMAI  2008-04-10 21:03:09 
Re: Fuel economy
Jorgen Moquist <jorgen  2008-04-10 23:33:18 
Re: Fuel economy
Alan <junk_reply@[EMAI  2008-04-10 22:55:02 
Re: Fuel economy
Jorgen Moquist <jorgen  2008-04-11 22:56:30 
Re: Fuel economy
Al <alnews67@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-11 10:39:02 
Re: Fuel economy
Springy <Idonot.wanto@  2008-04-11 17:53:19 
Re: Fuel economy
Chris Whelan <cawhelan  2008-04-11 18:04:58 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 27 1:55:10 CDT 2008.