Re: Apology to all for my Netiquette "Sorry"

I'm not going to debate it.  I've debated it ad nauseum in the past
and besides, I don't owe you or anyone that anyway.  Top posting makes
more sense.  Johnny come lately self appointed arbiters of internet
rules can suck my left nut.  They are wrong, and so are the people who
wor****p them.  The new material belongs right up front at the top.  It
isn't laziness.  The cursor programmatically starts off inserting the
new material at the top (instead of the bottom) for a reason.  If you
can't stand the heat, get the hell out of the kitchen.

On 26 Mar 2006 12:31:24 -0800, "Ed Pirrero" <gcmschemist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>
>SgtSilicon wrote:
>
>> On 25 Mar 2006 10:58:14 -0800, "Ed Pirrero" <gcmschemist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Tom wrote:
>> >> apology accepted. and just to let you know, most of the time what
ticks
>> >> people of more than anything else is "cross posting" a subject that
has
>> >> nothing to do with the newsgroup or 20 other newsgroups it is posted
in.
>> >
>> >Or top-posting.  That sucks too.
>
>[top-posting fixed]
>
>> There is nothing wrong with top posting.
>
>You need to do some research.  Top-posting is just plain lazy - just
>like full-quoting.
>
>Unless you read the newspaper from back-to-front, or books from the
>bottom of the page to the top.  Then, never mind.
>
>Yes, yes - I've heard every justification.  Go out and do some reading
>on netiquette, and learn something.
>
>Or don't.
>
>E.P.