Re: Apology to all for my Netiquette "Sorry"

On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 21:33:09 GMT, secretspam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(SgtSilicon) wrote:

>I'm not going to debate it.  I've debated it ad nauseum in the past
>and besides, I don't owe you or anyone that anyway.  Top posting makes
>more sense.  Johnny come lately self appointed arbiters of internet
>rules can suck my left nut.  They are wrong, and so are the people who
>wor****p them.  The new material belongs right up front at the top.  It
>isn't laziness.  The cursor programmatically starts off inserting the
>new material at the top (instead of the bottom) for a reason.  If you
>can't stand the heat, get the hell out of the kitchen.

Why even reply to any post on the subject?  If you are correct, then
there is no need to argue about it, even if no one knows to what you
are referring to.  

I personally believe that it is laziness that is the main reason for
top posting and not snipping or paring down the post.  Hey, if that is
the way you learned how to post a message, so be it.  Though that
doesn't make it correct like you believe it is.  

Btw, the cursor is always at the top because that is the way it has
always been.  It is the most logical place for it to be, kind of like
using the right or left side of the road while driving, depending on
the country you're in.

                          ...Ron
--
68'RS Camaro
88'Formula
00'GT Mustang