Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Honda - General > Fit vs. Si
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 4 Topic 13404 of 14135
Post > Topic >>

Fit vs. Si

by Dave Garrett <dave@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 10, 2008 at 01:36 PM

Took the Accord in to the dealer yesterday for an oil change, and while 
I was examining a Fit S****t on the lot (a rare sight at dealer lots 
around here, although they're finally starting to become a bit more 
common), a salescritter wandered over and I decided to take it for a 
spin since I had some time to kill. 

First impressions: roomy and comfortable (although since my regular 
daily driver is a CRX, just about anything else qualifies as roomy and 
comfortable), feels solidly put together with typical Honda quality. 
Nicer than you'd generally expect something in this price range to be. 
Didn't really test the handling much, but the engine had plenty of pep. 
The Fit weighs about 400 pounds more than my CRX, with roughly the same 
power, so it would be nice to have a bit more power, but as it stands 
it's certainly adequate. This one had the 5-speed manual, and again, 
there was the usual Honda slickness you'd expect. 

It'll be interesting to see if these start to get discounted at all as 
the all-new 2009 Fit gets closer. Judging from this:

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/FirstDrives/articleId=122688

there will be some pretty significant changes in the new car. 

Pulled back into the lot, and saw someone else returning from a test 
drive of a Civic Si sedan. I couldn't resist the chance to check that 
one out, so while I still had the salesman's attention, I had him go and 
grab the keys. Interior: nicer than the Fit, but the gauge cluster 
absolutely blows. The digital speedo is awkwardly placed, but not nearly 
as badly as the tach - like many have complained of previously, if 
you're tall, the entire 10-to-2 quadrant is completely obscured by the 
top of the steering wheel. It wasn't that long ago that Honda would 
never have allowed an ergonomic disaster like this to go any further 
than the drawing board. I'd take the Fit's much more functional and 
traditional gauge cluster over this one in a heartbeat. 

The real attraction, the engine, did not disappoint. As soon as you 
start it, it's apparent from the exhaust sound even at idle that it's 
not your average grocery-getter. Plenty of power, stratospheric rev 
limit, it doesn't get much better than this. The downside: this car had 
the optional NAV system, and the sticker was over $25K. Yeah, it's a 
very nice car, but I can't see paying that kind of cash for it. I didn't 
check the price on the NAV, but I'd bet it tacked on at least a grand to 
the base price. 

Now, if I could get the Si's K-series motor in the Fit...%-)

Dave
 




 4 Posts in Topic:
Fit vs. Si
Dave Garrett <dave@[EM  2008-02-10 13:36:31 
Private Message
   2008-02-10 19:13:40 
Private Message
   2008-02-10 21:59:56 
Private Message
   2008-02-11 13:35:50 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Oct 11 7:46:23 CDT 2008.