Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Jaguar > Re: XK8 vs. 500...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 6 of 6 Topic 2775 of 2830
Post > Topic >>

Re: XK8 vs. 500SL

by "Alan Strickland" <alstrick@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nov 18, 2007 at 05:03 AM

Nice car, and a nice price.

Issues with the Jaguar you've found:

1. Nikasil cylinder liners. These were in some Jaguar V8 engines up until
the 2000 model year. (see VIN numbers in the link below).High sulfur
content
fuels erodes  liners, and eventually the engine loses all compression and
simply won't start.
2. Timing chain tensioners. In Jaguar V8 engines up to the 2003 model
year,
Jaguar used plastic upper tensioners, which can crack, leading to chain
jump
and potential valve damage.
3. Like timing chain tensioners, Jaguar used plastic impellers in the
water
pumps in the V8. These eventually fail.

Get a blow by test to determine whether the car you are looking at is
suffering as a result of Nikasil. If not, it is likely OK -- there is far
less sulfur in fuels these days.

As for the tensioners and water pump, they will have to be replaced for
sure
(upgraded metal parts are now available), and you should get quotes on the
work and deduct it from the asking price. Cost for this work in Canada
(all
chains, upper and lower tensioners and guides and the water pump) is about
$2300 -- about 1000 pounds.

Here is an article on these issues:

http://www.racinggreencars.com/modern/The%20Jaguar%20AJ-V8%20Engine%20Strengths%20and%20Weaknesses.pdf

Regards,

Alan S.
Victoria Canada

"Nein!" <nein@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:13jpkgmdfmuccd4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Here is the choice I have to make, it's down to two cars.   1991 500SL,
95k,
> excellent condition with AMG wheels, well looked after with history,
> stunning with the AMG body kit.  Dealer is asking $13k.  I have always
liked
> the SL series so I was just going to make an offer on this car, until I
> decided to comb the classifieds one more time.  Turns out a 1998 XK8
convert
> (silver/black) just came up for sale near me as well for the exact same
> price as the 500SL.  Jag has 75k but no service history other than the
small
> amount carfax has told me (looks like it WAS serviced reguarly during
its
> life).  I did drive the XK8 and it runs and drives nice, but has a few
small
> cracks in the wood, the cupholders or whatever in the arm rest are
broken,
> we had to jump the car to get it started and the convertable was slow to
go
> up and down and needed a little helping push from me.   Beautiful
otherwise.
> I've owned about four jags in the past and a S1 E-TYPE currently and
driving
> the XK8 reminded me why I like the cars so much. It just oozed soul,
> character and passion.   I've never owned an SL before but there is no
doubt
> in my mind that it would be the 'smarter' car to own.  This is a big
> decision for me, and i'd like to hear some thoughts from a few others
before
> I make up my mind.  I haven't driven that 91 500SL yet but I did drive a
> 600SL the other day and it was a real monster.  My past DD Jags haven't
been
> the most reliable cars (XJS, XJ6) and I don't want to get into an XK8
and
> have another money pit on my hands.  Are they fairly well put together
and
> reliable? What should I check for in the XK8? Any other comments? 
Thanks
> guys!  Cheers
>
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
XK8 vs. 500SL
"Nein!" <nei  2007-11-15 17:11:15 
Re: XK8 vs. 500SL
"Nein!" <nei  2007-11-15 17:19:39 
Re: XK8 vs. 500SL
Turenne <richard.licht  2007-11-16 13:20:50 
Re: XK8 vs. 500SL
Turenne <richard.licht  2007-11-16 13:22:34 
Re: XK8 vs. 500SL
"Adysthemic" &l  2007-11-16 16:18:44 
Re: XK8 vs. 500SL
"Alan Strickland&quo  2007-11-18 05:03:59 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 5:32:01 CDT 2008.