On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 14:20:31 -0800 (PST), mcbrue <mcbrue@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>Hey Dave W! What is your take on the sag in my car? I can tell you
>don't approve of anyone who says that Lexus is not perfect, but that
>is not particularly usefull unless you need reinforcement of your
>decision to buy a Lexus or series of them as some of us have done.
This johngdole character has repeatedly posted flat-out false
statements about various Lexus models as facts. I don't know his
motivation for this, but it's not "usefull".
He has also posted here in a Lexus newsgroup that people who buy them
are idiots. This is slightly different than saying Lexus isn't
perfect, wouldn't you say?
>The level of human engineering in the Lexus is low - look at a Mercedes
>for comparison.
I have no idea what that means - are Lexus using monkeys?
>Of course the Mercedes will break down a lot more
>often. In the first 25,000 miles that I owned the last MercedesS420, I
>had to take it to the dealer 3 or 4 times. Hmmm ... this LS430 has now
>had what I consider to be 3 major faults - $7000 radar unit, air
>suspension sag which Lexus calls normal, and the random bumper sensor
>going off which Lexus declines to cover under warranty. Hmmm ... and
>the car was sold to me as new with 500 miles on it - my bad for buying
>it like that of course. Hmmmm .... and this "use group" is populated
>by "folks" who attack anyone who criticizes a Lexus for having major
>faults ...
I'd say that it is uncommon to have so many major problems with a
Lexus, and somewhat less uncommon with a Mercedes. Certainly, you're
not the first person who's been unhappy with their Lexus, but it
shouldn't surprise you that other Lexus owners who post here have
noticed that every time you show up here, it's with a generally
sarcastic rant about what a disappointment your car has been.
I think it's time you trade that lemon in for something that was
engineered by humans.
|
