Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Lexus > Re: LS 460 Revi...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 8 Topic 3420 of 3538
Post > Topic >>

Re: LS 460 Review

by johngdole@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mar 27, 2008 at 07:35 PM

I don't doubt if there are Toyota employees in these groups against
badmouthing people who realized Lexus really have nothing under the
sheet metal.

I think mcbrue you are right, people who have owned true luxury cars,
even mainstream ones like BMW and Mercedes, can *easily and quickly*
tell that Lexus is really isn't a luxury car but a dolled up Toyota.
That's all.


On Mar 26, 8:08 pm, mcbrue <mcb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Thank you for your thoughtfull and thorough reviews! This sort of
> information is why we come to these usegoups. My own history with
> Lexus covers three cars from Lexus over the years since 1993. I had
> always gone up in quality of cars purchased and when I got the first
> Lexus ES300 it was great! Then I moved to Mercedes and my wife stayed
> with another ES. After my second Mercedes, an S class, I moved back to
> a 2006 LS430 ultra. To keep it very short, I find the car sorely
> lacking. And the lack is in the engineering details that distinguish
> the true luxury car from the near luxury car. It would not be
> difficult for the Lexus engineers to sit and think how to make the
> "goodies" truly good! Regarding my car, I could go on for pages
> describing the minor changes that would vastly improve the car and end
> many great frustrations. On the other hand, certainly the
> dependability of the Lexus (ignore the radar, bumper sensors, and air
> suspensors) is vastly superior to the Mercedes. Adding it all up - the
> Lexus has many, many, many problems which prevent it from being
> considered a true Luxury car. And the amazing thing is that I have
> never been contacted by their vaunted QC system to get my opinion!
> This is a true shortcoming of such a system - ignoring the unhappy
> customer who can contribute many ideas for improvement. And I must
> warn DanO and Muzzy that you are likely to be rather strongly attacked
> by the "inhabitants" of this news group. Many of them take a negative
> view of the cars as a personal attack on them - perhaps they are
> employees of Lexus. Maybe we won't hear from them, but feel free to
> ignore them if we do. And again, thank you for your re****ts. I have
> had a few experiences with my own nav system which lead me to view it
> as being strongly capable of improvement, but I have no other
> experience to judge it against.
 




 8 Posts in Topic:
LS 460 Review
"DanO" <danc  2008-03-26 09:13:09 
Re: LS 460 Review
muzzy <x33y55z@[EMAIL   2008-03-26 13:05:26 
Re: LS 460 Review
mcbrue <mcbrue@[EMAIL   2008-03-26 20:08:28 
Re: LS 460 Review
muzzy <x33y55z@[EMAIL   2008-03-27 18:11:34 
Re: LS 460 Review
johngdole@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-03-27 19:35:09 
Re: LS 460 Review
"GIga" <a@[E  2008-03-28 22:51:56 
Re: LS 460 Review
fourQ2 <fourQ2@[EMAIL   2008-03-29 07:22:28 
Re: LS 460 Review
johngdole@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-03-27 19:55:05 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 5:04:34 CDT 2008.