Re: Rain-X value....

"*" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:01c613dd$d7ed6f80$f4a1c3d8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Budd Cochran <mr-d150@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 SPAM.net> wrote in article
> <43c02b77$0$3022$6d36acad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
>> Or . . .
>>
>> ya could do like I was taught and NOT FOLLOW SO DARN CLOSE.
>>
>> The 2 second following rule applies in clear, dry weather, in rain add
> 2-3+
>> seconds and snow add about a minute, but YMMV.
>>
>> Budd
>> ( Who hasn't had an accident attributable to himself in a quarter
century
>
>> . .
>> well, no accidents in a quarter century)
>>
>
>> "*" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:01c613c9$43d62620$f4a1c3d8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >
>> >
>> > I think the value of Rain-X comes right to the front when you pull
out
>> > into
>> > the rooster tail of a semi to pass it on the Interstate......
>> >
>> > ......the forward vision while riding in the rooster tail is almost
not
> to
>> > be believed.
>> >
>> > Since I travel the Interstate frequently, that reason alone is
> sufficient
>> > for me to use Rain-X on a regular basis.
>> >
>
>
> I was referring to that period of time when you are pulling up alongside
> the truck - in the ADJACENT LANE!!!!!! - on the divided Interstate
> highway.....
>
> ......It CAN be a blinding experience.....
>
> I am astounded at how often things have to be spelled out for some
> people........
>
> I said I pulled "....out into the rooster tail...."......
>
> .......which most people of average intelligence would translate into me
> pulling out from the lane behind the truck - which doesn't even SUGGEST
> that I was tailgating - into the adjacent passing lane - at which point
I
> would NOT be following the truck "....SO DARN CLOSE..."......
>
> ....I would not be "following" it at ALL!!!!!!
>
> ......I would be BESIDE the truck.......executing my mission - which was

> to
> safely PASS the truck......the accomplishment of said mission being made
> safer by the way Rain-X keeps the wind****eld clear  of water under those
> conditions.......
>
> .......conditions which often result in relatively lengthy periods of a
> wind****eld completely covered with water interrupted only briefly by the
> passing of the wiper.......Who here doesn't know what I am talking
> about???????
>
> I, too, have been a quarter-century without an attributable accident - a
> quarter-century of 40-50,000 miles-per-year!!!!
>
> Knee-jerkers annoy me......
>
> They skim over something quickly, and instead of paying attention what
the
> author actually said, they place their own meaning on it.......and jump
in
> with a totally unrelated, usually inappropriate answer....
>
> Doesn't ANYBODY have ANY sort of reading comprehension and attention
span
> any more?????
>
Attention spam?? WTF is that???