Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Macho - Trucks > Re: Rain-X valu...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 49 of 86 Topic 275 of 325
Post > Topic >>

Re: Rain-X value....

by "Roy" <Roy@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 8, 2006 at 12:24 AM

"v8z" <juiced@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:t71wf.13075$%D1.7345@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Budd Cochran" <mr-d150@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 SPAM.net> wrote in message
> news:43c084c2$0$3034$6d36acad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "*" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:01c613dd$d7ed6f80$f4a1c3d8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>> > Budd Cochran <mr-d150@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 SPAM.net> wrote in article
>> > <43c02b77$0$3022$6d36acad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
>> >> Or . . .
>> >>
>> >> ya could do like I was taught and NOT FOLLOW SO DARN CLOSE.
>> >>
>> >> The 2 second following rule applies in clear, dry weather, in rain
add
>> > 2-3+
>> >> seconds and snow add about a minute, but YMMV.
>> >>
>> >> Budd
>> >> ( Who hasn't had an accident attributable to himself in a quarter
> century
>> >
>> >> . .
>> >> well, no accidents in a quarter century)
>> >>
>>
>> > I was referring to that period of time when you are pulling up 
>> > alongside
>> > the truck - in the ADJACENT LANE!!!!!! - on the divided Interstate
>> > highway.....
>> >
>> > ......It CAN be a blinding experience.....
>>
>> Yes, especially if you pull out too close to the truck. Try dropping
back
> a
>> bit ( gives better view around the truck as well) accelerate in your
lane
>> and pull out before you get to the rooster tail. You'll zip thru much
> faster
>> and lose your vision for a shorter time. Do this in dry weather and you
> find
>> you get better gas economy because you're not putting dents in the
>> floorboard to get up speed.
>>
>> >
>> > I am astounded at how often things have to be spelled out for some
>> > people........
>> >
>> > I said I pulled "....out into the rooster tail...."......
>>
>> Now you have to be insulting? I've been driving for 40 years next
month,
>> probably longer than you been alive. I got maximum scores in every safe
>> driving test I've ever taken, scored one imperfect score on a driving 
>> test
>> just four years ago (all others were perfect scores), was driving
> instructor
>> in the military. . . .now, who do you think needs it spelled out for 
>> them?
>> >
>> > .......which most people of average intelligence would translate into

>> > me
>> > pulling out from the lane behind the truck - which doesn't even
SUGGEST
>> > that I was tailgating - into the adjacent passing lane - at which
point
> I
>> > would NOT be following the truck "....SO DARN CLOSE..."......
>>
>> If you're pulling out into the rooster tail, you're too close.
>> >
>> > ....I would not be "following" it at ALL!!!!!!
>>
>> If you are in the lane behind the truck before pulling to the other
lane,
>> you are following . . or about to be in a head on accident.
>> >
>> > ......I would be BESIDE the truck.......executing my mission - which 
>> > was
>> > to
>> > safely PASS the truck......the accomplishment of said mission being 
>> > made
>> > safer by the way Rain-X keeps the wind****eld clear  of water under 
>> > those
>> > conditions.......
>>
>> Mission??? You a top-secret government agent or something? Your
>> RESPONSIBILITY is to pass the truck safely. By pulling out before you
are
> so
>> close as to get soaked in the rooster tail, you reduce the chances of
an
>> accident due to reduced visibility . . .( sarcasm mode at full) talk 
>> about
>> needing to spell it out . . .
>> >
>> > .......conditions which often result in relatively lengthy periods of
a
>> > wind****eld completely covered with water interrupted only briefly by 
>> > the
>> > passing of the wiper.......Who here doesn't know what I am talking
>> > about???????
>>
>> Only those that have not learned you don't have to be on a truck's
bumper
>> before pulling out to pass.
>> >
>> > I, too, have been a quarter-century without an attributable accident
- 
>> > a
>> > quarter-century of 40-50,000 miles-per-year!!!!
>>
>> WOW!!! That's what percent of your total driving time? Larger, btw, is 
>> not
>> always better. The other four accidents I was involved in were spread 
>> over
>> the previous 15 years and only two of the total were my fault.
>>
>> > Knee-jerkers annoy me......
>>
>> And spammers annoy me. So does not catching fish, but that's different.
>> Yours was the knee-jerk reaction, btw. I was only giving sound, proven
>> advice on how to drive safely. It is unfortunate it proves a lack of
need
>> for your spam, er, product, no, spam, yep, spamola. Ah darn, you
cowardly
>> types use a munged addy so you can't be re****ted.  . . .you think . . .
>>
>> >
>> > They skim over something quickly, and instead of paying attention
what
> the
>> > author actually said, they place their own meaning on it.......and
jump
> in
>> > with a totally unrelated, usually inappropriate answer....
>>
>> ROTFLMBO!!!!! The answer was appropriate, spammer, it just didn't
sup****t
>> your spam spiel, that's all.
>> >
>> > Doesn't ANYBODY have ANY sort of reading comprehension and attention
> span
>> > any more?????
>>
>> Well, you apparently don't, or you wouldn't have your panties in a
bunch
>> claiming I misread your spam.
>>
>> Some folks re****t spammers like you, I like to rip their spiels to
shreds
> .
>> . .more of a mental challenge, ya know, except when they fall apart and
>> start being insulting as quickly as you did.
>>
>> Darn, and I thought you could handle it . . . . .
>>
>> Budd \
>
> Hey Budd, blow it out yer ass....  You're exactly the kind of newsgroup
> poster who doesn't bother to read a message before shoveling off a load
of
> drivel.
>
> Take a moment to read back through this inane thread, and really
> READ what Roy said,

Huh???  What'd I say???

Roy
 




 86 Posts in Topic:
Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Simms Bike Werks&qu  2006-01-06 13:21:46 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"*" <nospam@  2006-01-06 15:29:18 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
The Nolalu Barn Owl <&  2006-01-06 21:58:32 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
RSCamaro <rscamero@[EM  2006-01-07 03:20:21 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Carolina Watercraft  2006-01-07 11:03:04 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Greg O" <go  2006-01-07 13:55:40 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Carolina Watercraft  2006-01-08 09:58:25 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Greg O" <go  2006-01-08 09:44:56 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Carolina Watercraft  2006-01-08 12:19:02 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Hairy" <hai  2006-01-08 11:43:36 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Roy" <Roy@[  2006-01-08 14:30:25 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Carolina Watercraft  2006-01-09 09:20:21 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Roy" <Roy@[  2006-01-09 09:33:24 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"TBone" <tbo  2006-01-09 19:21:29 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Christopher Thomps  2006-01-09 20:39:57 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Carolina Watercraft  2006-01-10 09:26:54 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"TBone" <tbo  2006-01-11 19:35:22 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Carolina Watercraft  2006-01-12 09:40:54 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Budd Cochran"   2006-01-08 12:21:42 
Re: Rain-X value....
RSCamaro <rscamero@[EM  2006-01-09 23:18:35 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Budd Cochran"   2006-01-06 20:00:17 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Denny" <wdd  2006-01-07 10:39:54 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Mike Simmons"   2006-01-07 05:01:41 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Denny" <wdd  2006-01-07 11:38:09 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Roy" <Roy@[  2006-01-07 11:50:26 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Denny" <wdd  2006-01-07 18:45:51 
Rain-X value....
"*" <nospam@  2006-01-07 14:45:33 
Re: Rain-X value....
"(PeteCresswell)&quo  2006-01-07 16:00:52 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Roy" <Roy@[  2006-01-07 17:25:15 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Denny" <wdd  2006-01-07 22:44:27 
Re: Rain-X value....
no one <noone@[EMAIL P  2006-01-08 04:16:01 
Re: Rain-X value....
Michael McNeil <michae  2006-01-08 19:03:36 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Budd Cochran"   2006-01-07 14:03:08 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Roy" <Roy@[  2006-01-07 17:26:43 
Re: Rain-X value....
"(PeteCresswell)&quo  2006-01-07 17:27:42 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Budd Cochran"   2006-01-07 15:58:15 
Re: Rain-X value....
"(PeteCresswell)&quo  2006-01-07 19:50:39 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Budd Cochran"   2006-01-07 19:49:13 
Re: Rain-X value....
"MoParMaN" <  2006-01-08 18:39:33 
Re: Rain-X value....
Grumpy AuContraire <Gr  2006-01-09 00:59:03 
Re: Rain-X value....
JPH <jphagcanbereached  2006-01-08 19:47:08 
Re: Rain-X value....
"*" <nospam@  2006-01-07 17:13:16 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Roy" <Roy@[  2006-01-07 19:17:04 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Budd Cochran"   2006-01-07 20:24:34 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Hairy" <hai  2006-01-07 22:26:06 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Budd Cochran"   2006-01-08 06:08:49 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Hairy" <hai  2006-01-08 10:42:50 
Re: Rain-X value....
"v8z" <juice  2006-01-08 05:08:41 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Roy" <Roy@[  2006-01-08 00:24:09 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Budd Cochran"   2006-01-08 06:16:04 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Roy" <Roy@[  2006-01-08 10:24:50 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Budd Cochran"   2006-01-08 09:02:35 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Roy" <Roy@[  2006-01-08 14:19:05 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Budd Cochran"   2006-01-08 06:15:14 
Re: Rain-X value....
"*" <nospam@  2006-01-08 05:51:23 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Budd Cochran"   2006-01-08 06:33:50 
Re: Rain-X value....
"*" <nospam@  2006-01-08 10:02:48 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Budd Cochran"   2006-01-08 09:51:43 
Re: Rain-X value....
"*" <nospam@  2006-01-08 11:14:44 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Hairy" <hai  2006-01-08 11:38:43 
Re: Rain-X value....
Jerry <jlrice1655@[EMA  2006-01-09 18:41:49 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Budd Cochran"   2006-01-08 09:52:35 
Re: Rain-X value....
RSCamaro <rscamero@[EM  2006-01-08 17:25:32 
Re: Rain-X value....
"(PeteCresswell)&quo  2006-01-08 13:42:23 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Eric G" <re  2006-01-08 23:08:57 
Re: Rain-X value....
Grumpy AuContraire <Gr  2006-01-10 01:22:39 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Roy" <Roy@[  2006-01-08 14:24:19 
Re: Rain-X value....
RSCamaro <rscamero@[EM  2006-01-08 21:07:19 
Re: Rain-X value....
"DAVID SHAUBS"   2006-06-15 01:51:45 
Re: Rain-X value....
"T-Bearden" <  2006-06-15 17:45:18 
Re: Rain-X value....
pakeha@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2006-06-15 21:46:22 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Tyrone Walker"  2006-06-19 08:17:43 
Re: Rain-X value....
"*" <nospam@  2006-01-08 06:24:55 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Budd Cochran"   2006-01-08 06:40:21 
Re: Rain-X value....
"FMB" <fmbb@  2006-01-08 14:41:43 
Re: Rain-X value....
"*" <nospam@  2006-01-08 10:53:48 
Re: Rain-X value....
Jerry <jlrice1655@[EMA  2006-01-08 04:05:23 
Re: Rain-X value....
Michael McNeil <michae  2006-01-08 19:02:38 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
Jerry <jlrice1655@[EMA  2006-01-08 03:58:44 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Budd Cochran"   2006-01-07 06:13:51 
Re: Rain Repel - For Extreme Weather
"Roy" <Roy@[  2006-01-07 11:47:17 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Budd Cochran"   2006-01-08 14:40:17 
Re: Rain-X value....
"mongomopar" &l  2006-01-09 14:07:46 
Re: Rain-X value....
theguy <theguy@[EMAIL   2006-01-09 17:20:51 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Budd Cochran"   2006-01-09 18:52:43 
Re: Rain-X value....
"Hairy" <hai  2006-01-09 20:44:00 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 5:21:55 CDT 2008.