Re: Rain-X value....

On 8 Jan 2006 12:21:42 -0800, "Budd Cochran" <mr-d150@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>> I'd guess that you don't let yourself get into such situations.
>
>And you guessed wrong. Driving isn't a guessing game, it's reality.

It's not reality, its a responsibility.  

<snip>

>I apologize only for the spam claim and yet you continue with the
>endorsements? Did I waste an apology?

Did I ask for an apology? 

>>
>>  As for the visible residue left by using Rain-X (someone made a
>> comment about it), I can't remember ever noticing anything of the sort
>> and I've been using Rain-X as well as clear wax since I was a
>> teenager, over 20 years now.
>
>Then I was right, I've driven longer than you've breathed life.

What was your point here?

The GE Cor****ation was dumping PCBs into the Hudson river before I
breathed life also, were they right to do this?  Does this mean that
you are smarter or more capable of handling yourself in sticky
situations?  It means nothing more than that you've had more birthdays
than I have.  I drive every day on some of the most congested roads on
the planet.  Does driving in more adverse conditions more often mean
anything.

<snip>

>You have the right to your opinion and the right to be wrong in
>thinking it's the only way to avoid the problem.

I understand that you are finished and probably won't reply.  I just
haven't received a good enough answer as to why the aforementioned
chemical is such a bad thing.  Prove to me why I'm wrong.

                      ...Ron
>
>I'm finished with this stuff.
>
>Budd
--
68'RS Camaro
88'Formula
00'GT Mustang