On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 12:27:32 -0700, aorueng@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>On Aug 17, 3:34 pm, GlazedHam <Glazed...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> The Twelve Commandments of Flaming
>> Lawsuit threats: This is the reverse of Rule #4 (sort of like the Yin &
>> Yang of Flaming). Threatening a lawsuit is always considered to be in
>> good form.
>
>Threatening without follow through is never good form. Thankfully
>internet harassment using people's real names, especially when those
>people have done nothing to the stalker will soon become a thing of
>the past. I'm currently watching over the shoulder of a firm doing
>this, pro-bono, from a journalistic point of view.
hmm do keep us up to date
>
>So far it amazes me how not only will the stalker be charged, but if
>they're using a company computer.... we're talking serious money
>awards and you can guess who will get the most of that? Not the
>stalkee's.
>
>Bascially if you're going to attack someone, make is someone that is
>attacking you and keep the ***ual connotations out of it. If you are
>not intelligent enough not to do that, I suggest finding a new hobby.
well that would put people like woge r out of targets
"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a
congress"
adams
woger you are a Congress all in your own head
http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/
G
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
