Re: Identification Question

"KC4UAI" <kc4uai@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:dc263a4d-1968-4579-b1d1-0944eef37c35@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I was looking for a graphic of the US Ham Bands that included the ARRL
> band plan to replace the out of date posters in the club's shack.  I
> went to looking around and found a few neat looking PDF files but I
> couldn't find a poster that has both the Part 97.301 and the ARRL band
> plan in graphical form.
>
> I couldn't find what I wanted, so in true ham radio style I started to
> develop one of my own.  While I was digging though part 97.301 and the
> ITU band plans I came up with an unanswered question. In Part 97.301,
> only 60 Meters is specified to be USB.  The rest of the bands can
> legally be used with either USB or LSB when using SSB phone. I figured
> that the ARRL's band plan would specify USB or LSB for the band, but
> they don't, at least in the tables I found.
>
> I understand that there is a convention born of convenience when SSB
> was just getting started.  Apparently it was easier to build multi-
> band rigs for SSB that did upper and lower side band on various bands
> when this all got started but most of us don't build our rigs today.
>
> Where can I find out what the convention here is for 160, 80, 40, 20,
> 17, 15, 12, 10, 6, 2 (and up) SSB phone operation?
>
> Thanks!
>
> -= bob =-
well at laest more on topic than the OT libel posted by chennal cop et al 


-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com