Re: Bernard Law ****fted Geoghan from parish to parish in less than

On Apr 27, 9:27=A0am, duke <duckgumb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 04:43:32 -0700 (PDT), Gwen
<bennetwitho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> =
wrote:
> > Well, he could grow his own, if he'd give up this stupid idea that
> >there is some sort of god who'll save him from all of his troubles.
>
> Christian: =A0win/no win. =A0Atheist: =A0lose/no win. =A0No win comes
into=
 play if there
> is no almighty God.
>
> All evidence to be found demands the existence of God.

What evidence?  There has not been any evidence that demands the
existence of any deity.

>=A0There is no evidence
> that God does not exist.

The lack of evidence to show that a deity exists sup****ts the position
that the deity does not exist.  That is the default assumption in any
case.  The person taking the position that the deity does not exist
does not have the burden of proof.  The burden of proof rests solely
with the person claiming that the deity does exist.

Mark Sebree

>
> duke