Re: Bernard Law ****fted Geoghan from parish to parish in less than

On Apr 27, 1:45=A0pm, duke <duckgumb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 08:44:17 -0700 (PDT), Mark Sebree
<seb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> >On Apr 27, 9:27=A0am, duke <duckgumb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 04:43:32 -0700 (PDT), Gwen
<bennetwitho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> > Well, he could grow his own, if he'd give up this stupid idea that
> >> >there is some sort of god who'll save him from all of his troubles.
>
> >> Christian: =A0win/no win. =A0Atheist: =A0lose/no win. =A0No win comes
i=
nto play if there
> >> is no almighty God.
>
> >> All evidence to be found demands the existence of God.
>
> >What evidence? =A0There has not been any evidence that demands the
> >existence of any deity.
>
> You've been told too =A0many times, and yet you still can't remember.
=A0N=
o point in
> my repeating it.

And the reasons why your supposed evidence does not sup****t your
claims has been explained to you many times, and you cannot remember
what you were told, nor can you improve and explain your claim.  What
you have claimed does not provide any evidence that your deity exist.
You do not explain how and why the Big Bang needs your deity to
happen, and thus is not evidence to show that your deity exists.  You
never connect your claim to your evidence, and you never show that it
is YOUR deity that was supposedly responsible for the event.

I remember what you type very well.  You cannot seem to remember why
your claims do not work, however.

Like I said, you have never provided any evidence that sup****ts the
existence of your deity.

Mark Sebree

>
> duke