

|
 |
| Autos - Cars > Nissan Z-Car > Re: Nissan Z, s... |
|
| << Topic |
< Post |
Post 6 of 14 Topic 1320 of 1343
|
Post > |
Topic >> |
Re: Nissan Z, step aside
by Scott in SoCal <scottenaztlan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Oct 26, 2007 at 05:07 PM
| On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:31:51 GMT, still me <wheeledBob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>Most turbo's today blow heavy by about 2K RPM, so it's really not
>"higher revs" anymore. Once you are off the line, it's cranking. I
>have to admit, it took me over a year to figure out how to have it
>blowing as you take off.
By brake-torquing it? :)
>Back to your question "is it worth the hassle?". Traditionally, the
>turbo will get better mileage than the non-turbo for the same amount
>of power as it is more efficient.
Then turbos are different than belt-driven superchargers. My 2003
Cobra had a 4.6L engine with a Roots supercharger, and its gas mileage
sucked so bad I had to pay a $1000 Gas Guzzler Tax when I bought it.
The fuel economy was MUCH worse than the normally-aspirated 4.6L
engine in my previous Cobra (or in the Mustang GT).
>Also, they aren't really very complicated. Every car is already fuel
>injected and run by a computer metering fuel and/or air these days.
>Engine controls throw feedback to the computer and it adjusts. Same
>old thing. The turbo system just adds a little plumbing and a couple
>more controls. It's actually very simple and easy to get your hands
>around.
All right, you've convinced me to not dismiss a turbocharged car
out-of-hand.
>I think the real draw is the incredible torque in mid to upper range.
>With most NA engines I've driven, they can pull pretty hard but the
>pull is fairly straight then it drops off. With the turbo, as boost
>builds, the pull just starts increasing as the boost builds, like an
>invisible hand pu****ng you along.
Kinda like a Honda VTEC engine. :)
>I don't think any designs have used that since the mid-90's, but I'm
>no industry expert. Synthetic oil has made a big difference as dino
>oil will coke up turbo bearings at shutoff. Previously, turbos guys
>would let the engine idle for a little bit when pulling in to let the
>turbo cool. I haven't heard of that being an issue in any recent model
>turbos.
Good to know. Thanks for the info!


|
14 Posts in Topic:
|
"C. E. White" & |
2007-10-24 17:53:18 |
|
Scott in SoCal <scotte |
2007-10-24 17:34:10 |
|
still me <wheeledBob@[ |
2007-10-26 04:55:31 |
|
Scott in SoCal <scotte |
2007-10-26 06:53:56 |
|
still me <wheeledBob@[ |
2007-10-26 22:31:51 |
|
Scott in SoCal <scotte |
2007-10-26 17:07:35 |
|
"Dustin" <me |
2007-10-27 00:40:11 |
|
still me <wheeledBob@[ |
2007-10-27 14:32:31 |
|
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR |
2007-10-24 17:52:24 |
|
"C. E. White" & |
2007-10-25 07:18:44 |
|
gpsman <gpsman@[EMAIL |
2007-10-25 04:03:42 |
|
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR |
2007-10-25 09:00:45 |
|
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR |
2007-10-25 09:02:18 |
|
Scott in SoCal <scotte |
2007-10-25 17:59:22 |
|
Post A Reply:

|
|
|
|