Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Nissan > Re: why the sig...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 15 Topic 8872 of 9050
Post > Topic >>

Re: why the significant gas mileage difference?

by "C. E. White" <cewhite3@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 21, 2008 at 10:44 AM

"nucleus" <rose122550@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:fda31907-0d64-4083-ac0f-4b3f9d7bc9f6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> have been driving a 94 and 96 nissan sentra for several years.  THE
> 96 CONSISTENTLY AVERAGES OVER 4 MPG GREATER THAT THE 94.
>
> both are stock cars, 4 door, 1.6 liter engines, 4 speed/overdrive 
> auto
> transmissions, have same brand & size tires and use the same tire
> pressures, which are adjusted monthly. both cars have almost 
> identical
> total mileage.  no dragging brakes.
>
> the 96 has a different shaped body and is presumably more
> aerodynamically
> efficient.  however, both autos are driven in the same city & 
> highway
> mileage
> conditions.  the 96 gets better mileage in city driving, than does 
> the
> 94.
>
> is there some sensor, that DOES NOT set a computer code, that can
> cause
> the computer to run the 94 engine richer than the 96 engine?

How carefully are you checking your mileage?
Have you checked the odometers against each other? (i.e., Are both 
cars showing the same number of miles for a given identical trip?)
The 1996 has slightly higher HP (115 vs 110 for the '94). I assume 
this is because the 1996 engine is slightly more efficient (higher 
compression ratio, or less internal friction, or more efficient intake 
tract). I doubt the difference is worth 4 mpg, but it might be worth 
some improvement.
Have you weighed the cars?
The 1996 actually has about 7% greater frontal area, so unless it has 
much more aerodynamic shape, there is likely to be little difference 
in fuel economy do to aerodynamic drag.
The "combined" EPA estimated mileage for the 1994 was 26 mpg. For the 
1996 it was 28 mpg. So I would expect the 1996 to get slightly better 
mileage. Given the normal variation in vehicles, and mileage 
estimates, I'd say the variation you are seeing between the two cars 
is reasonable. The fueleconomy.gov web page also includes MPG 
estimates from actual drivers. Unfortunately there were not enough 
people posting for cars like yours to draw any reasonable conclusions 
(two drivers of 1994 Sentras averaged 30.4 mpg, one driver of a 1996 
averaged 38 mpg).

Ed
 




 15 Posts in Topic:
why the significant gas mileage difference?
nucleus <rose122550@[E  2008-04-19 16:44:15 
Re: why the significant gas mileage difference?
al <abuonag@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-19 18:05:04 
Re: why the significant gas mileage difference?
Ed Light <nobody@[EMAI  2008-04-19 19:41:08 
Re: why the significant gas mileage difference?
nucleus <rose122550@[E  2008-04-20 04:24:08 
Re: why the significant gas mileage difference?
al <abuonag@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-20 19:52:51 
Re: why the significant gas mileage difference?
nucleus <rose122550@[E  2008-04-21 05:11:10 
Re: why the significant gas mileage difference?
"C. E. White" &  2008-04-21 10:44:23 
Re: why the significant gas mileage difference?
Ed Light <nobody@[EMAI  2008-04-21 18:34:58 
Re: why the significant gas mileage difference?
Codifus <codifus@[EMAI  2008-04-25 11:14:24 
Re: why the significant gas mileage difference?
Jim Yanik <jyanik@[EMA  2008-04-25 15:27:59 
Re: why the significant gas mileage difference?
codifus <codifus@[EMAI  2008-04-25 08:45:43 
Re: why the significant gas mileage difference?
nucleus <rose122550@[E  2008-04-29 16:41:24 
Re: why the significant gas mileage difference?
Codifus <codifus@[EMAI  2008-05-02 16:55:19 
Re: why the significant gas mileage difference?
Jim Yanik <jyanik@[EMA  2008-05-03 00:44:56 
Re: why the significant gas mileage difference?
Codifus <codifus@[EMAI  2008-05-04 14:41:55 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 27 1:08:40 CDT 2008.