Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Car and Auto Forums > Peugeot > Re: 407 v 406
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 15 Topic 7641 of 7898
Post > Topic >>

Re: 407 v 406

by Albert T Cone <mmmm@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 1, 2008 at 02:30 PM

Ken wrote:
> Our 406SV is about ten years old and we are looking at 407s or Mercs
> for a replacement.
> 
> There have not been many posts about 407s - which may mean that noone
> is buying them but, hopefully, means that they have been fairly
> problem-free (if Peugeot monitor this group they will be soldering the
> air bag leads under the seats on the assembly line).
> 
> What can group members tell me about the 407? Is it better than the
> 406? How? And what about the diesel version - plenty of posts about
> the 406 HDI - no particular drama.
> 
> There are probably many group members in a similar position to me -
> lets kick some info around about 406 replacements. I will be test-
> driving a 407 HDI and a Merc Kompressor on Monday. Stay tuned.

I don't have direct personal experience, but my boss has had both, and 
had far fewer problems with the 406.  All the problems he has had with 
the 407 have been niggling electrical type problems which the dealers 
can't diagnose.  I do know that the 407 is a pretty nice thing to drive, 
and that the 136Bhp Hdi lump is quite sweet, although not as economical 
as one might expect.  The boot opening on the estate is both quite 
clever and rather stupid - the two-way opening is quite clever, but the 
aperture you have when fully open through which to insert camping 
gear/dogs/wa****ng machines is really quite small.  On balance he 
preferred the 406.

I have no experience of the modern mercs, so can't help there :-)
 




 15 Posts in Topic:
407 v 406
Ken <kkerrison@[EMAIL   2008-02-01 00:50:51 
Re: 407 v 406
Chrs <chris@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-01 13:25:19 
Re: 407 v 406
Albert T Cone <mmmm@[E  2008-02-01 14:30:53 
Re: 407 v 406
Ken <kkerrison@[EMAIL   2008-02-01 23:40:45 
Re: 407 v 406
"Robin Bendall"  2008-02-02 22:14:39 
Re: 407 v 406
"G.T" <g.t6@  2008-02-03 13:19:51 
Re: 407 v 406
"Robin Bendall"  2008-02-03 19:29:24 
Re: 407 v 406
"G.T" <g.t6@  2008-02-03 21:39:32 
Re: 407 v 406
cornwall <curious@[EMA  2008-02-02 11:51:07 
Re: 407 v 406
Chrs <chris@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-02 11:57:51 
Re: 407 v 406
Chris <chris@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-03 20:51:30 
Re: 407 v 406
"stu" <ff@[E  2008-02-03 21:58:50 
Re: 407 v 406
"Anonymous." &l  2008-02-04 10:43:51 
Re: 407 v 406
Ken <kkerrison@[EMAIL   2008-02-05 00:38:44 
Re: 407 v 406
Ken <kkerrison@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 21:20:53 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Nov 23 6:52:56 CST 2008.