Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Porsche - 911 > Re: 944 running...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 6 of 6 Topic 1406 of 1454
Post > Topic >>

Re: 944 running costs compared to 911SC?

by epbrown <emanuel.brown@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 4, 2007 at 06:59 PM

On Oct 3, 1:49 am, Rudi <mail.rudi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> I'd like to know there is a specific time period in the 944's life where
> it was a great car to buy or years which is better left alone. Like the
> 911 years between 1984 and say 1988 were good years. Or does the same
> rule count when buying 944, buy the latest one I can afford?
>
The turbo and 944S and 944S2 are the most expensive to maintain, in
that order. In my opinion, the 944S2 is the best buy in terms of
performance, looks, and running costs. After that, I'd get an oval
dash 8-valve, myself, though I reckon most would go for the 951.

epbrown
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
944 running costs compared to 911SC?
Rudi <mail.rudi.cl@[EM  2007-10-02 14:54:30 
Re: 944 running costs compared to 911SC?
E Brown <three1983s@[E  2007-10-02 15:53:54 
Re: 944 running costs compared to 911SC?
"William Noble"  2007-10-02 10:00:27 
Re: 944 running costs compared to 911SC?
Rudi <mail.rudi.cl@[EM  2007-10-03 08:49:03 
Re: 944 running costs compared to 911SC?
"William Noble"  2007-10-04 22:38:15 
Re: 944 running costs compared to 911SC?
epbrown <emanuel.brown  2007-10-04 18:59:17 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 25 2:12:30 CDT 2008.