Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Porsche - 911 > Re: 911 F/R wei...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 5 Topic 1410 of 1460
Post > Topic >>

Re: 911 F/R weight distribution question

by "William Noble" <nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 8, 2007 at 09:36 PM

so, is this where I mention going around a corner (just a normal 
intersection) at about 35 mph in my 356A - didn't notice water in the 
intersection - so I completed the turn, but instead of 90 degrees like I 
expected, I made a full 270 and found myself gliding backwards --- so what

to do?  just swing the wheel to full lock, and the car snapped around to
the 
proper direction and I proceeded on my way - much to the surprise of both 
myself and the oncomming traffic.   And, you will recall that the 356A 
weighed only 1600 pounds and had a full 45 HP to push it along.


"Guru" <Guru@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:fIsOi.7150$6p6.7144@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> While the early 911 models were a real handful handling-wise, some
clever 
> engineering over the years has "tamed" the swinging beast.  Changes to
the 
> rear suspension geometry, along with ever larger rear tires, and various

> versions of traction control or ESC (electronic stability control) have 
> aided in this effort.  If you're going to drive on the street, you'll
only 
> experience some rear end swing in extreme conditions...such as wet roads

> or loose gravel.  Even so...in the newer cars, this is not much of an 
> issue. You want to swing out the rear end...reduce the size of the rear 
> tires, turn off the stability control and take your foot off the 
> accelerator in a sweeping turn.  It can be an adventure.  (The original 
> turbos in the mid-'70's accentuated the issue, as the turbo boost came
in 
> suddenly @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 3500 RPM...and that dramatic increase in power, along with no

> stability control could be rather unnerving.  Hence...today's turbos are

> AWD...and very stable.)
>
> "Lawrence Lugar" <lawrence_lugar@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:rCPNi.118442$xZ2.74459@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> ...it's not Almost in the back of the rear axle - it IS on the back of 
>> the rear axle; hence the 911 being referred to as a 'rear-engine' car
>>
>> the Boxster, 360, F430, Elise's engine resides, for the most part, on
or 
>> just a bit forward of the rear axle.
>>
>> the 911 is roughly a 40/60%, F/R weight distribution.
>>
>>
>> on hard fast turns, the rear tends to swing out ahead of you - with a 
>> 911.
>> for all instensive purposes, for street driving - you'll rarely 
>> experience that...but on a track of wide open space, it's rather
evident.
>>
>> alot of people find that 'swinging' fun, it's almost like a balet
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "stinkeroo" <kennykabuki@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:1191690064.025978.300090@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> In the 911, it looks like the engine is almost in back of the rear
>>> axle.  I would think that would put most of the weight on the rear,
>>> making it very hard to handle in corners.
>>>
>>> But apparently it isn't?
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> 



-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 




 5 Posts in Topic:
911 F/R weight distribution question
stinkeroo <kennykabuki  2007-10-06 10:01:04 
Re: 911 F/R weight distribution question
"Lawrence Lugar"  2007-10-06 10:28:45 
Re: 911 F/R weight distribution question
"Guru" <Guru  2007-10-08 16:15:07 
Re: 911 F/R weight distribution question
"William Noble"  2007-10-08 21:36:11 
Re: 911 F/R weight distribution question
The Dead Senator <dead  2007-10-09 19:21:46 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Aug 30 6:02:58 CDT 2008.