On Jan 10, 4:37=A0pm, "Sheldon" <shel...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Lawrence Lugar" <lawrence_lu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:UlW2j.9380$Rw3.1542@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > in regards to being a daily driver...
>
> > how ***bersome, in your opinion, is a Manual 911...vs a Tiptronic?
>
> I would say it's up to you. =A0Most "average" drivers can turn better
lap
> times with a Tiptronic than a manual, and there is a demand for
Tiptronic
> vehicles, so it's not like when you sell it people only want manuals.
=A0A=
lso,
> while a manual can be fun to drive, and is considered the "proper" way
to
> ****ft a s****ts car like a ****sche, if you get stuck in bumper to bumper
> traffic you will bless the day you decided on the Tiptronic.
>
> Again, while not being "proper," you really have the best of both
worlds.
> And for those who don't believe in automatic ****fters, think about all
the=
> high-end cars that are clutchless and use paddle ****fters, like Formula
On=
e
> cars.
Good to see this topic. I thought that I'd (:)] bring up S****tomatic,
which was the manual transmission unit [various speed combinations]
with a semiautomatic clutch (used ONLY stop/start; VW counterpart
"autostick****ft" had NO manual clutch).
That was the 1968-1980 one, which most here know.
|
