"kk" <kkk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:7YqdnVTNntJzgx3aRVnyjQA@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Bert Kanters" <ff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:199ef$477eea3b$541c1857$13061@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "pissfall" <pissfall@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> schreef in bericht
>> news:K-KdnTlYEJcVV-PaRVnyugA@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Strangely, its actually better loooking than a 308, I assume its
> actually
>> > quicker than one too, the 308/328 are pedestrian compaired
>> > to 'supercars' of their year, a 911SC was far, far more quicker (and
> built
>> > to last)
>> >
>> Not true.
>>
>
> Yes probably the kit wasn't better looking but the ****sche 911 was far
> more
> quicker and built to last
> Hence the 'huge' rise in residual values of the classic 911, Ferrari is
a
> myth based on people have more money than sense.
> Poorly manufactured cars, cheap labour, cheap paint and tinpot
materials.
>
> Everyone whom I have met who has owned a Ferrari always has vast tales
of
> woe to tell, everyone whom has owned a 911 rejoices in its sheer ability
> to
> do everything perfectly & that includes being a better drive and also
far
> quicker than its Ferrari counterparts.
>
> Within 20 years, Ferrari simply won't exist, stock up on your parts now
!
>
Before I got my 911 it was a toss up between the 911 and the 308. Both
had
equal specs, and, to my eyes, the Ferrari was beautiful while the ****sche
was classic. I read a road test comparing the two, and while the Ferrari
got better marks for being more civil in the handling department (no
unexpected 180's), the ****sche got higher marks from the writers as a fun
car to take on a trip. Add to that the fact that there is nobody around
here who fixes Ferrari's and it wasn't a hard decision to make. That
said,
the 308 I didn't buy is worth a lot more than my 911 today.
|
