On Mar 5, 12:57 pm, "Jerry Forrester" <forr62(no spam)@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> I just pulled a booger out of my nose.
> It is a one of a kind, unrestored, unmolested, completely original and
> showing no wear what so ever.
> Does anyone think I can get $58K for it.
> I doubt it.
> Rarity does not equate to value. <GGGGGGGGGGG>
>
> --
> thanks,
> Jerry Forrester
> check out my ebay store....http://stores.ebay.com/CHROME-CHROME-CHROME
>
> "Lee Aanderud" <aande...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:47cebe57$0$29827$88260bb3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Bob"
<bshap...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>news:ba94aab5-d340-4b30-b31d-b3f66e826634@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> 3,663
>
> > > Hmmmm ..... that's quite a few more than the 70 R2 Hawks made in
'64,
> > > with only 24 of those being non-package cars, and who knows how many
> > > are mint survivors. You can easily spend this much on a proper
> > > restoration and what do you end up with? ... an unoriginal car.
>
> > Good luck getting $58,000 for it... my advice is if someone offers you
50%
> > of that, grab it and run.
>
> > You might want to look over this 1 of 9 '63 to get an idea of what
those
> > cars are selling for.
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=646...
> tem=&item=300201077577
>
>
>
> > Lee
>
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
Have you seen and compared both cars? The red '63 is a patched up
'restored' car with not great paint and poor fitting panels, vinyl on
dash, etc. etc. NO COMPARISON! and it still brought more than $30k ...
and about $20k more was spent on it? Good investment? I don't think
so. 1 of 9 ???? ... right, whatever.
|
