Re: 1964 GT HAWK R2 mint original car for sale

On Mar 5, 8:12=A0pm, John Poulos <ava...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Bob wrote:
>
> Not great paint
>
> translation: Not much better then factory, but a 5K plus clear/coat
> color coat
>
> Poor fitting panels
>
> translation: I have no idea what you are talking about unless it was the
> hood which I did align.
>
> vinyl on dash
>
> Translation:
>
> true, but it is the vinyl wood grain as used by the factory back in 63
>
> No doubt your car may be nicer in some area's, but the red Hawk was not
> exactly a turd. maybe a condition 2. =A0Some folks might even prefer a
> everything rebuilt/upgraded in the last 5000 miles car to a nice
> original one. I did not knock your car, just commenting on current
> market value.
>
>
>
> > Have you seen and compared both cars? The red '63 is a patched up
> > 'restored' car with not great paint and poor fitting panels, vinyl on
> > dash, etc. etc. NO COMPARISON! and it still brought more than $30k ...
> > and about $20k more was spent on it? Good investment? I don't think
> > so. 1 of 9 ???? =A0 =A0... right, whatever.
>
> --
> JP/Maryland
> Studebaker On the Nethttp://stude.com
> My Ebay items:http://www.stude.com/EBAY/
> 64 R2 GT Hawk
> 63 R2 GT Hawk
> 63 Lark 2 door
> 57 Wagon
> 51 Commander
> 39 Coupe Express
> 39 Coupe Express (body)

Man lots of comments by a bunch of not know it all people on this
one...  This is funny...