"Built_Well" <Built_Well_Toyota@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:8c9f0f74-c029-41b2-9f90-818c94bc9e84@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Ray, you wrote that you've [quote]"mentioned several times
> that changing the transmission strainer is not necessary, but
> you do not have to take my word and experience for it."
>
> You also wrote, "How many 20 year old transmission screens
> (actually called a strainer) have you looked at that need
> replacement? I haven't seen any."
>
> Ray, my man, can you point out where I stated that the
> transmission filter requires changing? Why are you implying
> to the group that I have ever said that?
>
> You seem to be putting words in my mouth so that you can pretend
> to come along and correct something I said, which I never said.
> Odd that you would feel the need to do that.
>
> And it sounds like you're blowing a gasket, too [chuckle]. Try to
> relax a little more, my friend :-)
>
> I've been busy all weekend, but finally had a chance to
> catch up with the thread.
>
> Chill out, Ray :-)
I guess I'm just a wannabe teacher who is trying to teach you a few things
about your car. When you mention the same thing more than once after the
"lesson" was presented, I get the impression, correctly or incorrectly,
that
perhaps my lesson didn't sink in, or that you don't believe that the
information in the lesson is correct.
While you did mention in another post that you probably would not attempt
more than a drain and refill, you did post this later:
> Has anyone ever removed their own car's ATF pan to
> replace its gasket and screen-filter or clean the
> magnets and clean the ATF pan itself? I guess after 20
> years it might make sense...
I was merely pointing out that even after 20 years, it would not make
sense
to replace the strainer.
--
Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)
|
