Talk About Network

Google





Car and Auto Forums > Toyota - Camry > Re: More on Top...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 33 of 68 Topic 8282 of 8516
Post > Topic >>

Re: More on Top Tier gasoline

by Retired VIP <jackj.extradots.180@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 30, 2008 at 11:24 AM

On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:17:58 -0700 (PDT), coachrose13@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>On Jul 29, 7:13 am, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <el...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>> In article <488ef841$0$4014$bbae4...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>  Fat Moe <Fat...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> > As far as getting extra mileage with
>> > higher octane?  I don't buy it,
>>
>> Octane is not the issue.  Cleanliness of the fuel injectors and intake
>> valves and combustion chambers is the issue.
>I've had my 98 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP for a little over ten years now,
>and follow the gas mileage carefully. Using 92 octane, I will get a
>full mile per gallon better than using mid-grade. Using 87 octane will
>cost me 3-4 mpg, so it costs me a LOT more by using the cheaper
>gasoline. The difference in acceleration is very noticeable as well.
>
>
>Of course, with the 3.8 supercharged engine, the owners manual states
>that premium unleaded is required, and I can see why.

Well of course you'll get better mileage using the grade of gasoline
recommended by the manufacturer.  That's a given.  There are a lot of
reasons why this is true and almost all have to do with pre-ignition,
not with the additive package.  In most cases, the premium grade will
have the exact same package as the regular grade.
>
>Based on these experiences I would not even consider running anything
>other than premium in my Trans Am.
>
>
>I am curious as to what, if any, difference that running premium in my
>06 GP (3.8 not supercharged) would make. I have only used 87 octane
>since I bought it two years ago.

Using a grade of gasoline that is above the manufacturer's
recommendation is a waste of money.  The manufacturer knows what his
product was designed to do and what it's requirements are.  You should
follow his recommendations.

Jack
 




 68 Posts in Topic:
More on Top Tier gasoline
Built_Well <Built_Well  2008-07-28 13:02:09 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
Hachiroku <Trueno@[EMA  2008-07-28 17:08:25 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
Built_Well <Built_Well  2008-07-28 14:19:46 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
Paul <Paul@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-28 17:01:57 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
"Mark A" <no  2008-07-28 18:14:21 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
"HLS" <nospa  2008-07-28 19:05:41 
Private Message
   2008-07-28 19:59:04 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
"doug" <NOSP  2008-07-28 22:34:52 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
"Pete" <nona  2008-07-28 23:46:02 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
Retired VIP <jackj.ext  2008-07-29 15:29:24 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-29 13:05:17 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
Retired VIP <jackj.ext  2008-07-29 19:35:28 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
"Tomes" <ask  2008-08-11 21:20:44 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
hsg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-29 10:32:38 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
Fat Moe <FatMoe@[EMAIL  2008-07-29 06:00:38 
Private Message
   2008-07-29 07:13:10 
Private Message
   2008-07-29 07:14:12 
Private Message
   2008-07-29 06:38:08 
Private Message
   2008-07-29 13:05:37 
Private Message
   2008-07-29 08:15:23 
Private Message
   2008-07-29 08:16:15 
Private Message
   2008-07-29 08:33:48 
Private Message
   2008-07-29 12:59:49 
Private Message
   2008-07-29 18:02:58 
Private Message
   2008-07-29 19:28:07 
Private Message
   2008-07-30 06:42:06 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
hsg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-29 13:00:15 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
Retired VIP <jackj.ext  2008-07-29 15:43:35 
Private Message
   2008-07-29 12:58:19 
Private Message
   2008-07-29 19:34:00 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
coachrose13@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-07-29 21:17:58 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
"Edwin Pawlowski&quo  2008-07-30 05:54:14 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
Retired VIP <jackj.ext  2008-07-30 11:24:32 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
"Mortimer" <  2008-07-30 12:51:35 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
"grinder@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-30 06:44:17 
Private Message
   2008-07-30 09:55:12 
Private Message
   2008-07-30 08:29:16 
Private Message
   2008-07-30 12:05:26 
Private Message
   2008-07-30 10:49:45 
Private Message
   2008-07-30 15:54:45 
Private Message
   2008-07-30 14:33:52 
Private Message
   2008-07-30 14:35:27 
Private Message
   2008-07-30 17:10:29 
Private Message
   2008-07-30 16:45:28 
Private Message
   2008-07-30 16:04:13 
Private Message
   2008-07-30 18:09:05 
Private Message
   2008-07-30 23:02:13 
Private Message
   2008-07-30 19:48:05 
Private Message
   2008-07-31 09:57:35 
Private Message
   2008-07-31 08:06:39 
Private Message
   2008-07-31 08:54:28 
Private Message
   2008-07-31 08:20:57 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku  2008-07-30 18:40:18 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
EdV <systmengr@[EMAIL   2008-07-30 09:28:29 
Private Message
   2008-07-30 19:42:40 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
"Floyd Rogers"   2008-07-30 16:58:04 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
ben91932 <benteaches@[  2008-07-30 22:09:29 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
RT <noyabusiness@[EMAI  2008-07-31 13:00:35 
Private Message
   2008-07-31 20:48:08 
Private Message
   2008-07-31 20:57:09 
Private Message
   2008-08-01 10:43:29 
Private Message
   2008-08-01 13:18:44 
Private Message
   2008-08-01 13:19:35 
Private Message
   2008-08-01 13:12:48 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
coachrose13@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-07-31 20:30:11 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
Built_Well <Built_Well  2008-08-03 09:12:43 
Re: More on Top Tier gasoline
johngdole@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-08-04 23:27:51 
Private Message
   2008-08-05 06:32:34 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 18:45:36 PST 2009.